Department of Emergency Medicine, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, HungKuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1035-1043. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0169. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of laser acupuncture (LA) treatment with that of placebo LA treatment in patients with idiopathic, mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), as measured by subjective symptom assessments and objective changes in nerve conduction studies (NCSs). A randomized, single-blinded, controlled study. A Teaching Hospital in the Taichung, Taiwan between March 2013 and November 2013. 84 consecutive treatment-naive patients with CTS. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment arms: (1) LA, administered at traditional Chinese acu-points on the affected side, once a day, 5 times a week, for 4 weeks (N = 43); and (2) placebo LA, administered using the same device and protocol, with the LA device switched off (N = 41). Patients completed the Global symptom score (GSS) at baseline and two and four weeks later. The primary outcome was changes in GSS. NCSs were performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the study as a secondary outcome. There was a significantly greater reduction in GSS in the LA group than in the placebo group at week 2 (-9.30 ± 4.94 vs. -2.29 ± 4.27, respectively, P < 0.01) and at week 4 (-10.67 ± 5.98 vs. -2.90 ± 5.61, respectively, P < 0.01). However, NCSs did not show significant difference between the two groups. LA may be more effective than placebo LA in the treatment of mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS in terms of subjective measurement. For patients who fear needle-based treatment, such as acupuncture or local injections, or those who do not opt for early surgical decompression, LA treatment can be considered as an effective and alternative form of acu-points stimulation therapy.
本研究旨在比较激光针灸(LA)治疗与安慰剂 LA 治疗对特发性、轻中度腕管综合征(CTS)患者的疗效,通过主观症状评估和神经传导研究(NCS)的客观变化来衡量。一项随机、单盲、对照研究。2013 年 3 月至 2013 年 11 月在台湾台中市的一家教学医院进行。84 例连续未经治疗的 CTS 患者。参与者被随机分为两组治疗组:(1)LA,在患侧的传统中医穴位上进行,每天一次,每周 5 次,共 4 周(N=43);(2)安慰剂 LA,使用相同的设备和方案进行治疗,但将 LA 设备关闭(N=41)。患者在基线和 2 周、4 周后完成总体症状评分(GSS)。主要结局是 GSS 的变化。NCS 在基线时进行,并在研究结束时作为次要结局重复进行。在第 2 周(-9.30±4.94 与-2.29±4.27,分别,P<0.01)和第 4 周(-10.67±5.98 与-2.90±5.61,分别,P<0.01),LA 组的 GSS 降低幅度明显大于安慰剂 LA 组。然而,两组之间的 NCS 没有显示出显著差异。LA 在治疗轻度至中度特发性 CTS 方面可能比安慰剂 LA 更有效,尤其是在主观测量方面。对于那些害怕针刺治疗(如针灸或局部注射)或不选择早期手术减压的患者,LA 治疗可以被认为是一种有效的替代穴位刺激治疗方法。