Rosseĭkin E V, Kobzev E E, Bazylev V V
Federal Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Penza, Russia.
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2019;25(3):142-155. doi: 10.33529/ANGI02019319.
Implantation of a mechanical or biological graft remains the gold standard in treatment of patients with aortic valve pathology. However, the necessity of taking anticoagulants, the problem of graft durability, the risk for thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications, prosthetic infective endocarditis impel surgeons to search for and develop new technologies. One of such new techniques is prosthetic repair of the aortic valve using autologous pericardium according to the S. Ozaki operation. This procedure makes it possible to form an aortic valve with excellent haemodynamic characteristics and low frequency of re-do operations in both the early and remote periods. Current trends are towards exponential growth of minimally invasive cardiosurgical interventions. Upper partial sternotomy is one of the most commonly used techniques in surgery of the aortic valve. The results of previous studies demonstrated that a minimally invasive approach apart from a good cosmetic effect has a series of advantages over full sternotomy by the in-hospital and remote outcomes. On the other hand, a minimally invasive access is associated with limited surgical exposure and tight operative field and is therefore technically more complicated than the operation via full sternotomy. In our retrospective study we compared the clinical outcomes of the minimally invasive Ozaki technique (Ozaki Mini Group, n=30) and full sternotomy (Ozaki Full Group, n=112). Because of differences between the groups by the clinical and demographic parameters in order to ensure maximum comparability we conducted computer-assisted propensity score matching, resulting in formation of 2 groups consisting of 30 patients each. The primary outcome measures of the study were 30-day all-cause mortality and postoperative major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, stroke). As additional categorical outcomes we examined new-onset atrial fibrillation and renal failure, resternotomy, prolonged (>24 h) assisted artificial pulmonary ventilation, mediastinitis/sternal instability. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: the duration of the operation, duration of myocardial ischaemia and artificial circulation, blood loss, requirement for transfusion of donor blood components.
植入机械或生物移植物仍然是治疗主动脉瓣病变患者的金标准。然而,服用抗凝剂的必要性、移植物耐久性问题、血栓栓塞和出血并发症的风险、人工瓣膜感染性心内膜炎促使外科医生寻找和开发新技术。这种新技术之一是根据S. 小崎手术使用自体心包对主动脉瓣进行人工修复。该手术能够形成具有优异血流动力学特征且早期和远期再次手术频率低的主动脉瓣。当前的趋势是微创心脏外科手术呈指数级增长。上半部分胸骨切开术是主动脉瓣手术中最常用的技术之一。先前研究的结果表明,微创方法除了具有良好的美容效果外,在住院和远期结局方面比全胸骨切开术具有一系列优势。另一方面,微创入路与手术暴露受限和手术视野狭窄相关,因此在技术上比通过全胸骨切开术进行的手术更复杂。在我们的回顾性研究中,我们比较了微创小崎技术(小崎微创组,n = 30)和全胸骨切开术(小崎全胸骨切开组,n = 112)的临床结局。由于两组在临床和人口统计学参数上存在差异,为了确保最大程度的可比性,我们进行了计算机辅助倾向评分匹配,从而形成了每组由30名患者组成的两组。该研究的主要结局指标是30天全因死亡率和术后主要不良心脏事件(心肌梗死、中风)。作为额外的分类结局,我们检查了新发房颤和肾衰竭、再次胸骨切开术、延长(>24小时)的辅助人工肺通气、纵隔炎/胸骨不稳定。次要结局指标如下:手术持续时间、心肌缺血和人工循环持续时间、失血量、输注供体血液成分的需求。