Center for Brain and Cognition (CBC), Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA).
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Jan 3;25(1):80-90. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz031.
In the past years, there has been a significant increase in the number of people learning sign languages. For hearing second language (L2) signers, acquiring a sign language involves acquiring a new language in a different modality. Exploring how L2 sign perception is accomplished and how newly learned categories are created is the aim of the present study. In particular, we investigated handshape perception by means of two tasks, identification and discrimination. In two experiments, we compared groups of hearing L2 signers and groups with different knowledge of sign language. Experiment 1 explored three groups of children-hearing L2 signers, deaf signers, and hearing nonsigners. All groups obtained similar results in both identification and discrimination tasks regardless of sign language experience. In Experiment 2, two groups of adults-Catalan sign language learners (LSC) and nonsigners-perceived handshapes that could be permissible (either as a sign or as a gesture) or not. Both groups obtained similar results in both tasks and performed significantly different perceiving handshapes depending on their permissibility. The results obtained here suggest that sign language experience is not a determinant factor in handshape perception and support other hypotheses considering gesture experience.
在过去的几年中,学习手语的人数显著增加。对于听力第二语言(L2)的手语使用者来说,学习手语涉及到用不同的方式学习一种新的语言。探索 L2 手语感知是如何完成的,以及新学习的类别是如何创建的,这是本研究的目的。特别是,我们通过两个任务,识别和辨别,来研究手形感知。在两个实验中,我们比较了三组听力 L2 手语使用者,聋人手语使用者和听力非手语使用者。所有组在识别和辨别任务中都获得了相似的结果,无论其手语经验如何。在实验 2 中,我们比较了两组成年人,加泰罗尼亚手语学习者(LSC)和非手语使用者,他们感知可以允许的手形(无论是作为一个手势还是作为一个手势)或不允许的手形。两组在两个任务中都获得了相似的结果,并且根据手形的可允许性,对手形的感知有显著的差异。这里得到的结果表明,手语经验不是手形感知的决定因素,并支持其他考虑手势经验的假设。