Newman Aaron J, Supalla Ted, Fernandez Nina, Newport Elissa L, Bavelier Daphne
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2; Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2; Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2;
Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 15;112(37):11684-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510527112. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
Sign languages used by deaf communities around the world possess the same structural and organizational properties as spoken languages: In particular, they are richly expressive and also tightly grammatically constrained. They therefore offer the opportunity to investigate the extent to which the neural organization for language is modality independent, as well as to identify ways in which modality influences this organization. The fact that sign languages share the visual-manual modality with a nonlinguistic symbolic communicative system-gesture-further allows us to investigate where the boundaries lie between language and symbolic communication more generally. In the present study, we had three goals: to investigate the neural processing of linguistic structure in American Sign Language (using verbs of motion classifier constructions, which may lie at the boundary between language and gesture); to determine whether we could dissociate the brain systems involved in deriving meaning from symbolic communication (including both language and gesture) from those specifically engaged by linguistically structured content (sign language); and to assess whether sign language experience influences the neural systems used for understanding nonlinguistic gesture. The results demonstrated that even sign language constructions that appear on the surface to be similar to gesture are processed within the left-lateralized frontal-temporal network used for spoken languages-supporting claims that these constructions are linguistically structured. Moreover, although nonsigners engage regions involved in human action perception to process communicative, symbolic gestures, signers instead engage parts of the language-processing network-demonstrating an influence of experience on the perception of nonlinguistic stimuli.
特别是,它们具有丰富的表现力,并且在语法上也受到严格限制。因此,它们为研究语言的神经组织在多大程度上与模态无关提供了机会,同时也有助于确定模态影响这种组织的方式。手语与一种非语言符号交际系统——手势——共享视觉-手动模态,这一事实使我们能够更广泛地研究语言与符号交际之间的界限在哪里。在本研究中,我们有三个目标:研究美国手语中语言结构的神经处理(使用运动分类器结构动词,这类动词可能处于语言和手势的边界);确定我们是否能够区分从符号交际(包括语言和手势)中获取意义所涉及的大脑系统与由语言结构化内容(手语)专门参与的大脑系统;评估手语经验是否会影响用于理解非语言手势的神经系统。结果表明,即使是表面上看起来与手势相似的手语结构,也是在用于处理口语的左侧化额颞网络中进行处理的,这支持了这些结构具有语言结构的观点。此外,虽然非手语使用者会激活参与人类动作感知的区域来处理交际性符号手势,但手语使用者则会激活语言处理网络的部分区域,这表明经验对非语言刺激的感知有影响。