Suppr超能文献

女性腰骶部疼痛与盆底肌功能障碍的相关性研究。

Predictors of Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction Among Women With Lumbopelvic Pain.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2019 Dec 16;99(12):1703-1711. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence to suggest that a large proportion of individuals seeking care for lumbopelvic pain also have pelvic floor muscle dysfunction (PFMD). Because the majority of physical therapists do not have the requisite training to adequately assess pelvic floor musculature, determining predictors of PFMD could be clinically useful.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to establish a combination of factors (self-report and physical) predictive of PFMD in women with lumbopelvic pain.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Participants completed a battery of self-report and physical assessments (masked assessors). Three clinical findings characterized PFMD: weakness of the pelvic floor, lack of coordination of the pelvic floor, and pelvic floor muscle tenderness on palpation (bilateral obturator internus). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the extent to which different predictors were associated with PFMD.

RESULTS

One hundred eight women with self-reported lumbopelvic pain (within the past week) were included in the study (mean age = 40.4 years; SD = 12.6 years). None of the examined factors predicted pelvic floor muscle weakness. Two factors independently predicted pelvic floor muscle tenderness on palpation: very strong and/or uncontrollable urinary urges (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-7.59) and Central Sensitization Inventory scores of 40 or greater (OR = 3.13; 95% CI = 1.08-9.10).

LIMITATIONS

The sample consisted of young women, some of whom were not actively seeking care. Additionally, the technique for assessing pelvic floor muscle tenderness on palpation requires further validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who have lumbopelvic pain, uncontrollable urinary urgency, and central sensitization were, on average, 2 times more likely to test positive for pelvic floor muscle tenderness on palpation. Further studies are needed to validate and extend these findings.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,相当一部分寻求腰骶部疼痛治疗的患者也存在盆底肌功能障碍(PFMD)。由于大多数物理治疗师没有足够的评估盆底肌肉的培训,因此确定 PFMD 的预测因素可能具有临床意义。

目的

旨在建立一个能够预测腰骶部疼痛女性 PFMD 的综合因素(自我报告和体格检查)。

设计

这是一项横断面研究。

方法

参与者完成了一系列自我报告和体格检查(评估员进行了掩盖)。三个临床发现特征化了 PFMD:盆底肌无力、盆底肌协调缺失以及触诊时盆底肌压痛(双侧闭孔内肌)。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定不同预测因素与 PFMD 的关联程度。

结果

共有 108 名自我报告腰骶部疼痛(过去一周内)的女性参与了研究(平均年龄 40.4 岁;标准差 12.6 岁)。检查的因素均不能预测盆底肌无力。两个因素独立预测触诊时的盆底肌压痛:非常强烈和/或无法控制的尿意(优势比 [OR] 2.93;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.13-7.59)和中央敏化量表评分 40 分或更高(OR 3.13;95% CI 1.08-9.10)。

局限性

样本由年轻女性组成,其中一些人并非主动寻求治疗。此外,触诊评估盆底肌压痛的技术需要进一步验证。

结论

患有腰骶部疼痛、无法控制的尿意和中枢敏化的女性,平均而言,对触诊时的盆底肌压痛检测呈阳性的可能性增加了 2 倍。需要进一步的研究来验证和扩展这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验