Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):892-902. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01245-3. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Offsetting-trading losses in one place for commensurate gains in another-is a tool used to mitigate environmental impacts of development. Biodiversity and carbon are the most widely used targets of offsets; however, other ecosystem services are increasingly traded, introducing new risks to the environment and people. Here, we provide guidance on how to "trade with minimal trade-offs"- i.e. how to offset impacts on biodiversity without negatively affecting ecosystem services and vice versa. We briefly survey the literature on offsetting biodiversity, carbon and other ecosystem services, revealing that each subfield addresses unique issues (often overlooking those raised by others) and rarely assesses potential trade-offs. We discuss key differences between offsets that trade biodiversity and those that trade ecosystem services, conceptualise links between these different targets in an offsetting context and describe three broad approaches to manage potential trade-offs. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to strengthen the outcomes of offsetting policies that are emerging internationally.
在一个地方抵消交易损失,以在另一个地方获得相应的收益,是用来减轻发展对环境影响的一种工具。生物多样性和碳是最广泛使用的抵消目标;然而,其他生态系统服务的交易也在不断增加,这给环境和人类带来了新的风险。在这里,我们提供了如何“以最小的权衡进行交易”的指导,即如何在不负面影响生态系统服务的情况下抵消生物多样性的影响,反之亦然。我们简要地调查了关于生物多样性、碳和其他生态系统服务抵消的文献,揭示了每个子领域都解决了独特的问题(往往忽略了其他领域提出的问题),并且很少评估潜在的权衡。我们讨论了在抵消背景下交易生物多样性和交易生态系统服务的抵消之间的关键区别,概念化了这些不同目标之间的联系,并描述了管理潜在权衡的三种广泛方法。最后,我们提出了一个研究议程,以加强国际上正在出现的抵消政策的结果。