• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教学与学习技术在药学院的成本效益分析。

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Teaching and Learning Technology in a Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6834. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6834.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe6834
PMID:31507280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6718486/
Abstract

To conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of investment in teaching and learning technology (TLT) by a college of pharmacy in a large, research-intensive university in Canada. Document analysis was used to determine the goals and objectives of the university and college for TLT use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members to understand their perspectives on the value of technology for teaching and learning, their metrics to assess value, and an estimate of social value using a willingness to pay (WTP) exercise. A CBA was used to compare the social value against the cost of the investment in TLT. Twenty-one faculty members participated in semi-structured interviews. National, university, and college goals for TLT were diffuse and nonspecific in terms of the intended use or the metrics by which implementation and impacts on the quality of teaching could be assessed. The mean WTP for this technology was Can$4.38M and the cost of investment was Can$4.25M. The primary analysis showed a small positive net benefit of the investment (Can$134,456), although this difference was not significant. All dollar figures are given in Canadian dollars (CAD). The college's monetary investment in TLT was approximately equal to the social value placed on TLT by faculty users. Conducting a CBA on technology can bring greater understanding among faculty members of the college's curriculum and pedagogical practices as well as financial decision-making. Greater clarity about the goals and objectives for TLT could help to maximize the value of investment in this area.

摘要

对加拿大一所大型研究密集型大学药学院的教学技术投资进行成本效益分析(CBA)。 采用文献分析方法确定大学和学院使用教学技术的目标。对教师进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们对技术在教学中的价值、评估价值的指标以及使用意愿支付(WTP)练习估算社会价值的看法。使用 CBA 将社会价值与教学技术投资成本进行比较。 21 名教师参加了半结构化访谈。国家、大学和学院的 TLT 目标在技术的预期用途或评估实施和对教学质量影响的指标方面都很模糊且不具体。这项技术的平均 WTP 为 438 万加元,投资成本为 425 万加元。主要分析显示投资的净效益很小(134456 加元),尽管这一差异并不显著。所有金额均以加元(CAD)表示。 学院在 TLT 上的货币投资与教师用户对 TLT 的社会价值大致相等。对技术进行 CBA 可以使学院的课程和教学实践以及财务决策方面的教师成员有更深入的了解。更明确的 TLT 目标和目的可以帮助最大限度地提高该领域的投资价值。

相似文献

1
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Teaching and Learning Technology in a Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.教学与学习技术在药学院的成本效益分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6834. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6834.
2
Learning styles and teaching perspectives of Canadian pharmacy practice residents and faculty preceptors.加拿大药学实习医师和教师导师的学习风格和教学观点。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):163. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778163.
3
Faculty perceptions of a tobacco cessation train-the-trainer workshop and experiences with implementation: A qualitative follow-up study.教师对烟草戒断培训师培训工作坊的看法及其实施经验:一项定性随访研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Dec;15(12):1436-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
A Novel Mathematical Model for Determining Faculty Workload.一种用于确定教师工作量的新型数学模型。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809152.
5
Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.学生、教师和管理人员对课堂技术使用的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):75. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77475.
6
Simulation for Teaching Orthopaedic Residents in a Competency-based Curriculum: Do the Benefits Justify the Increased Costs?基于能力的课程中用于骨科住院医师教学的模拟:益处是否能证明成本增加是合理的?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):935-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4512-6.
7
Perceptions of technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate medical education at a private medical college in Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇一所私立医学院校本科医学教育中对技术增强型学习的认知
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;69(8):1108-1114.
8
Dental Hygiene Clinical Instructors' Pedagogical Beliefs and Described Practices About Student-Centered Education.口腔卫生临床教师关于以学生为中心教育的教学信念和描述性实践。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Sep;83(9):1019-1029. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.106. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Comparison of learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members.比较药剂学专业学生和教师的学习风格。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):192. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610192.
10
Economic Contributions of a College of Pharmacy to the Surrounding Communities and State.药学学院对周边社区和州的经济贡献。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7529. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7529.

引用本文的文献

1
The Triple-S framework: ensuring scalable, sustainable, and serviceable practices in educational technology.三重S框架:确保教育技术中可扩展、可持续和可用的实践。
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00378-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Using Standardized Patients to Assess Student-Pharmacist Communication Skills.使用标准化病人评估药学生医患沟通技巧的成本效益。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Dec;81(10):6120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6120.
2
When I say … cost and value.
Med Educ. 2017 Mar;51(3):246-247. doi: 10.1111/medu.13139. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Impact of a Paper vs Virtual Simulated Patient Case on Student-Perceived Confidence and Engagement.纸质病例与虚拟模拟患者病例对学生感知到的信心和参与度的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Feb 25;80(1):16. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80116.
4
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Blended Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students.针对医学生的循证医学混合式教学与面对面教学的成本效益分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 21;17(7):e182. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4346.
5
In reply to Spangler.
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1429-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000497.
6
Cost considerations in using simulations for medical training.在医学培训中使用模拟技术的成本考量。
Mil Med. 2013 Oct;178(10 Suppl):37-46. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00258.
7
Roles of innovation in education delivery.创新在教育提供中的作用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):154. doi: 10.5688/aj7308154.
8
Web 2.0 and pharmacy education.Web 2.0 与药学教育。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Nov 12;73(7):120. doi: 10.5688/aj7307120.
9
An economic analysis of patient simulators clinical training in nursing education.护理教育中患者模拟器临床培训的经济分析
Nurs Econ. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):24-9, 3.
10
Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats.支付意愿比较:投标博弈形式与开放式及支付量表形式
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.003.