• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于确定教师工作量的新型数学模型。

A Novel Mathematical Model for Determining Faculty Workload.

作者信息

Fitzpatrick Leo R, Millette-Snodgrass Carol, Atef Eman

机构信息

California Northstate University College of Pharmacy, Elk Grove, California.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809152.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe809152
PMID:28090101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5221834/
Abstract

To develop a mathematical model for determining faculty workload at a college of pharmacy with a team-based learning curriculum. Using faculty provided data, our model calculated activity and weighted means in teaching, scholarship and service. Subsequently, these data were used to develop departmental and institutional workload models. For the pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences department, percent faculty activity mean values were greatest for service followed by teaching and scholarship. These values in the clinical sciences department were greatest for teaching followed by service and scholarship. Overall, the institutional workload model had the largest maximum faculty activity value for teaching, followed by service and then scholarship. A novel faculty workload model proved to be effective in optimizing faculty workload within a college of pharmacy. Since the workload analysis, the faculty service commitment has been substantially changed, by reducing the number of committees at our institution. This type of workload analysis may particularly benefit colleges of pharmacy that employ a team based learning curriculum, with a large time commitment to teaching.

摘要

开发一个数学模型,用于确定采用基于团队学习课程的药学院教师工作量。利用教师提供的数据,我们的模型计算了教学、学术和服务方面的活动及加权平均值。随后,这些数据被用于开发部门和机构的工作量模型。对于制药与生物医学科学系,教师活动平均百分比在服务方面最高,其次是教学和学术。临床科学系的这些值在教学方面最高,其次是服务和学术。总体而言,机构工作量模型中教师教学活动的最大数值最大,其次是服务,然后是学术。一个新颖的教师工作量模型被证明在优化药学院教师工作量方面是有效的。自进行工作量分析以来,通过减少我们机构的委员会数量,教师的服务投入已大幅改变。这种工作量分析可能对采用基于团队学习课程且在教学上投入大量时间的药学院特别有益。

相似文献

1
A Novel Mathematical Model for Determining Faculty Workload.一种用于确定教师工作量的新型数学模型。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809152.
2
Design and Refinement of a Faculty Workload Estimator.教师工作量估算器的设计与改进。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Sep;88(9):101251. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101251. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
3
A preliminary model for faculty workload for a highly integrated curriculum delivered by team-based learning.基于团队学习的高度整合课程中教师工作量的初步模型。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Oct;10(10):1321-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
4
Publication Rates of Social and Administrative Sciences Pharmacy Faculty in Non-Research Intensive Pharmacy Schools.非研究密集型药学院校社会与行政科学药学教师的出版率。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6229. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6229.
5
Faculty awards at US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校的教师奖项。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Aug 15;72(4):85. doi: 10.5688/aj720485.
6
Publication Rates for Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty Members at Nonresearch-Intensive US Schools of Pharmacy.美国非研究密集型药学院药学专业教师的发表率
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):136. doi: 10.5688/ajpe799136.
7
Facilitating Advancement of Clinical-Track Pharmacy Faculty Members.促进临床药学教师的发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7910. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910.
8
Research funding expectations as a function of faculty teaching/administrative workload.研究资金期望作为教师教学/管理工作量的函数。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011 Jun;7(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
9
Pharmaceutical science faculty publication records at research-intensive pharmacy colleges and schools.研究型药学院校药学专业教师的科研出版物记录。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Nov 12;76(9):173. doi: 10.5688/ajpe769173.
10
Benchmark Report on Utilization of Faculty Workload Models in Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy.药学院校教师工作量模型利用基准报告
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jul;87(7):100002. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacy-related research for health in the Arab region: An analysis informed by WHO's global strategy on research for health.阿拉伯地区与药学相关的卫生研究:基于世界卫生组织全球卫生研究战略的分析
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Dec 14;5:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100099. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Gaps and Opportunities for Faculty Workload Policies in Pharmacy and Health Professions Education.药学与卫生专业教育中教师工作量政策的差距与机遇。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe9012. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9012. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Faculty Members' Opinions of What Defines a "Star" in Academic Pharmacy.教师对学术药学“明星”的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Sep;85(8):8581. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8581. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Facilitating Advancement of Clinical-Track Pharmacy Faculty Members.促进临床药学教师的发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7910. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910.

本文引用的文献

1
Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校的团队学习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe776115.
2
Research funding expectations as a function of faculty teaching/administrative workload.研究资金期望作为教师教学/管理工作量的函数。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011 Jun;7(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
3
Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module.将团队学习策略融入心血管模块。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Mar 10;74(2):35. doi: 10.5688/aj740235.
4
Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty.牙科、医学、护理和药学实践教员的学术障碍。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Oct 15;71(5):91. doi: 10.5688/aj710591.
5
Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty.药学院教师的职业流动意向
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):62. doi: 10.5688/aj710462.