• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舌下含服米索前列醇与 Foley 导尿管用于子痫前期或妊娠高血压妇女促宫颈成熟的随机对照试验。

Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial.

作者信息

Ayati Sedigheh, Hasanzadeh Elahe, Pourali Leila, Shakeri Mohammadtaghi, Vatanchi Atiye

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Jul 31;17(7):513-520. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i7.4863. eCollection 2019 Jul.

DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v17i7.4863
PMID:31508577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6718879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delivery is the only definite cure for hypertensive disorders. Therefore, cervical ripening and labor induction are important to achieve favorable outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This Randomized Control Trial (RCT) is aimed to compare the effects of sublingual misoprostol and Foley catheter in cervical ripening and labor induction among patients with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total number of 144 women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertention with indication of pregnancy termination, who were referred to academic hospitals of the University of Medical Sciences in Mashhad, Iran, between March 2015 and December 2016, were randomly divided into two groups. In group one (n = 72), 25 µg of misoprostol tablet was administrated sublingually every 4 hr up to six doses. In group two (n = 72), a 16F Foley catheter was placed through the internal cervical os, inflated with 60 cc of sterile saline.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups regarding the demographic characteristics, primary bishop score, and pregnancy termination indication. The cervical ripening time (primary outcome) (8.2 vs 14.2 hr, p 0.00), induction to delivery interval (15.5 vs 19.9 hr, p 0.00), and vaginal delivery before 24 hr (63.9% vs 40%, p = 0.03) were significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference between groups in view of oxytocin requirement (p = 0.12), neonatal Apgar score (p = 0.84), or neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 78).

CONCLUSION

This trial showed that the application of sublingual misoprostol, compared to the Foley catheter, can reduce cervical ripening period and other parameters related to the duration of vaginal delivery. This misoprostol regimen showed inconsiderable maternal complications.

摘要

背景

分娩是治疗高血压疾病的唯一确切方法。因此,宫颈成熟和引产对于取得良好结局很重要。

目的

本随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较舌下含服米索前列醇和Foley尿管在子痫前期或妊娠期高血压患者宫颈成熟和引产中的效果。

材料与方法

2015年3月至2016年12月间,共有144名单胎妊娠、因子痫前期或妊娠期高血压而需终止妊娠的孕妇被转诊至伊朗马什哈德医科大学的教学医院,并随机分为两组。第一组(n = 72),每4小时舌下含服25μg米索前列醇片,最多6剂。第二组(n = 72),将16F Foley尿管经宫颈内口置入,注入60cc无菌生理盐水使其膨胀。

结果

两组在人口统计学特征、初始Bishop评分和终止妊娠指征方面无显著差异。两组之间的宫颈成熟时间(主要结局)(8.2小时对14.2小时,p < 0.00)、引产至分娩间隔时间(15.5小时对19.9小时,p < 0.00)和24小时内阴道分娩率(63.9%对40%,p = 0.03)存在显著差异。两组在缩宫素需求量(p = 0.12)、新生儿阿氏评分(p = 0.84)或新生儿重症监护病房入住率(p = 0.78)方面无显著差异。

结论

本试验表明,与Foley尿管相比,舌下含服米索前列醇可缩短宫颈成熟时间及与阴道分娩持续时间相关的其他参数。该米索前列醇方案显示产妇并发症较少。

相似文献

1
Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial.舌下含服米索前列醇与 Foley 导尿管用于子痫前期或妊娠高血压妇女促宫颈成熟的随机对照试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Jul 31;17(7):513-520. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i7.4863. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Comparison of vaginal misoprostol with foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.阴道用米索前列醇与 Foley 导管用于宫颈成熟和引产的比较。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2011 Winter;10(1):149-54.
3
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis. Foley 导尿管联合前列腺素与 Foley 导尿管联合催产素用于宫颈成熟:网状荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):743.e1-743.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.引产前置宫颈成熟:经宫颈 Foley 导管与阴道内米索前列醇对比
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610500040737.
5
Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.经阴道与经口腔使用米索前列醇联合 Foley 导管用于足月宫颈成熟(BEGIN 试验):一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):524.e1-524.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
[Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].[宫颈 Foley 导管与阴道米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟和引产:一项随机临床试验]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;32(7):346-51. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000700007.
7
Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial.阴道米索前列醇与经宫颈 Foley 导管用于过期初产妇宫颈成熟:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04011-0.
8
A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.一项比较阴道用米索前列醇与 Foley 导管联合缩宫素用于引产的随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1045-52. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499447.
9
[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].[ Foley 导尿管引产的有效性和安全性评估]
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):180-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1560.
10
Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.宫颈内 Foley 导管联合/不联合缩宫素用于 Bishop 评分≤3 的引产:一项二次分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100350. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.机械方法引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
2
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.引产的机械方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.使用经宫颈 Foley 导管联合缩宫素与阴道米索前列醇的引产至分娩间隔时间:尼日利亚卡诺阿明努·卡诺教学医院的一项对比研究
Ann Afr Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;15(3):114-9. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.188890.
2
Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.联合使用福莱导尿管和阴道米索前列醇用于引产术前促宫颈成熟:一项随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Dec;56(6):578-584. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12489. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
足月口服米索前列醇与 Foley 导管引产(PROBAAT-II):一项多中心随机对照非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1619-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00084-2. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction.用于引产的 Foley 导管与阴道米索前列醇对比
Int J Reprod Med. 2015;2015:845735. doi: 10.1155/2015/845735. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
5
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较 Foley 导管、米索前列醇和地诺前列酮用于引产时的宫颈成熟。
BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.米索前列醇与 Foley 导管插入术用于胎儿生长受限妊娠引产的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
The risk factors for failure of labor induction: a cohort study.引产失败的风险因素:一项队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Apr;64(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0486-z. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
8
Comparison of vaginal misoprostol with foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.阴道用米索前列醇与 Foley 导管用于宫颈成熟和引产的比较。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2011 Winter;10(1):149-54.
9
Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Foley 导管与阴道米索前列醇:随机对照试验(PROBAAT-M 研究)及文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;31(2):145-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341573. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
10
Induction of labor in the United States: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility.美国的引产:适当性和可减少性的批判性评价。
Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):336-43. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.016.