• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同尺寸根管预备后下颌前磨牙牙根的抗折性

Fracture Resistance of Roots in Mandibular Premolars Following Root Canal Instrumentation of Different Sizes.

作者信息

Tian Shi Yu, Bai Wei, Jiang Wei Ran, Liang Yu Hong

出版信息

Chin J Dent Res. 2019;22(3):197-202. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a43114.

DOI:10.3290/j.cjdr.a43114
PMID:31508608
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the fracture resistance of mandibular premolar roots following root canal instrumentation with different sizes.

METHODS

A total of 100 human permanent mandibular premolars with a straight single canal were decoronated and assigned to 10 groups (n = 10) by block randomisation. In the control group, the roots were uninstrumented, whereas roots in the nine experimental groups were instrumented to different master apical files (MAF) and tapers (MAF/taper): 40/0.05, 45/0.05, 50/0.05, 55/0.05, 60/0.05, 40/0.10, 40/0.15, 45/0.10 and 45/0.15. All roots were subjected to vertical loading until fracture.

RESULTS

Fracture load values for instrumented roots were lower than the intact roots of the control group. In 50/0.05, 55/0.05, 60/0.05, 40/0.15 and 45/0.15 groups, the fracture load values were significantly lower than the fracture load value for the control group (P < 0.05) with a 30% decrease. No significant differences in the fracture modes were detected among the 10 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical instrumentation adversely affects the fracture resistance of roots. When the roots of mandibular premolars were instrumented to a MAF equal to or larger than 50 with a taper of 0.05 or to a MAF of 40 or 45 with a taper of 0.15, the fracture load values significantly decreased.

摘要

目的

测量不同规格根管预备后下颌前磨牙牙根的抗折性。

方法

选取100颗具有单一直根管的人类恒牙下颌前磨牙,去除牙冠,通过区组随机化分为10组(每组n = 10)。对照组牙根未进行预备,而9个试验组的牙根分别预备至不同的主尖锉(MAF)和锥度(MAF/锥度):40/0.05、45/0.05、50/0.05、55/0.05、60/0.05、40/0.10、40/0.15、45/0.10和45/0.15。所有牙根均进行垂直加载直至折断。

结果

预备后牙根的折断载荷值低于对照组的完整牙根。在50/0.05、55/0.05、60/0.05、40/0.15和45/0.15组中,折断载荷值显著低于对照组的折断载荷值(P < 0.05),降低了30%。10组之间的折断模式未检测到显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

机械预备对牙根的抗折性有不利影响。当下颌前磨牙牙根预备至MAF等于或大于50且锥度为0.05,或MAF为40或45且锥度为0.15时,折断载荷值显著降低。

相似文献

1
Fracture Resistance of Roots in Mandibular Premolars Following Root Canal Instrumentation of Different Sizes.不同尺寸根管预备后下颌前磨牙牙根的抗折性
Chin J Dent Res. 2019;22(3):197-202. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a43114.
2
[Impact of apical preparation diameter on fracture resistance of mandibular premolar roots].[根尖预备直径对下颌前磨牙牙根抗折性的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):92-5.
3
Resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL.MetaSEAL 对根管治疗后牙齿抗垂直根折的效果。
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):653-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Comparison of mandibular premolars and canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture.下颌前磨牙与尖牙垂直牙根折裂抗力的比较。
J Dent. 2004 May;32(4):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.12.002.
5
Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.保守性牙髓治疗窝洞对切牙、前磨牙和磨牙根管预备效果及抗折性的影响评估
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals.旋转ProTaper、Profile与传统逐步后退技术对粪肠球菌菌落形成单位减少及根管垂直抗折性影响的比较评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.021.
7
Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems.使用自调式锉和ProTaper旋转系统预备根管后的牙根抗折强度。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
8
[Effect of different root canal file tapers on fracture strength of root canal wall].[不同根管锉锥度对根管壁抗折强度的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2020 Oct;29(5):471-475.
9
Impacts of contracted endodontic cavities compared to traditional endodontic cavities in premolars.比较前磨牙中收缩的根管腔与传统根管腔的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01237-w.
10
Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation.手工和旋转器械进行根管预备后牙根的断裂强度
J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):529-32. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000150947.90682.a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Does minimally invasive canal preparation provide higher fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review of studies.微创根管预备是否能提高根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性?一项研究的系统评价。
Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Oct 17;48(4):e34. doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e34. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Does Low-Taper Root Canal Shaping Decrease the Risk of Root Fracture? A Systematic Review.低锥度根管预备是否能降低根折风险?一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jun 1;10(6):94. doi: 10.3390/dj10060094.
3
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with a Longer Single Post and Shorter Double Posts of Different Sizes: An Study.
不同尺寸较长单桩和较短双桩对上颌前磨牙根管治疗后抗折性能的研究:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Apr 20;10(2):183-184. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_472_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.