Department of Surgery, University of Bonn Medical School, Bonn, Germany
Department of Surgery, University of Bonn Medical School, Bonn, Germany.
Anticancer Res. 2019 Sep;39(9):5209-5218. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13718.
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of anastomotic leakage on survival rate and to define potential factors of risk and protection from bowel anastomotic leakage in patients with bowel segment resection treated for epithelial ovarian cancer in an accredited high-volume center.
Data of 136 patients treated with bowel resection between 2010 and 2017 were collected. All operations were performed by three accredited gynecological oncologists and by two specialized colorectal surgeons. Survival and anastomotic leakage rates were analyzed as per preoperative treatment, number and localization of anastomoses, grading of ovarian cancer, and protective loop ileostomy.
In total, anastomotic leakage was observed in 23 out of 165 anastomoses (13.9%), representing 23 anastomotic leakages in 136 patients (16.9%). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.73%. There was no statistically significant difference in anastomotic leakage rate depending on localization and number of anastomoses (p=0.634). Patients with a protective loop ileostomy (n=22/136 patients) had no anastomotic leakage (0.0%, p=0.021). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly different in patients without protective loop ileostomy depending on bevacizumab administration [no bevacizumab: 15/111 (13.5%) vs. bevacizumab administration: 4/8 (50.0%), p=0.007]. Tumor-positive resection margins in bowel segments were an independent prognostic factor (relative risk=6.3; 95% confidence intervaI=3.1-12.9).
In this data set, protective loop ileostomy likely reduced the anastomotic leakage rate after bowel resection in selected cases of ovarian cancer treated with debulking surgery. Especially in patients treated with bevacizumab, protective loop ileostomy should be considered. There was no significant impact of leakage rate on overall survival.
本回顾性研究旨在探讨吻合口漏对生存率的影响,并确定在认可的高容量中心接受结段切除术治疗上皮性卵巢癌的患者中,发生肠吻合口漏的潜在风险和保护因素。
收集了 2010 年至 2017 年间接受肠切除术的 136 名患者的数据。所有手术均由三位认可的妇科肿瘤学家和两位专业的结直肠外科医生进行。根据术前治疗、吻合口数量和位置、卵巢癌分级以及保护性回肠造口术,分析吻合口漏和生存率。
总共在 165 个吻合口中观察到 23 个吻合口漏(13.9%),在 136 名患者中有 23 个吻合口漏(16.9%)。30 天死亡率为 0.73%。吻合口漏发生率与吻合口位置和数量无统计学差异(p=0.634)。行保护性回肠造口术(n=22/136 例)的患者无一例吻合口漏(0.0%,p=0.021)。无保护性回肠造口术的患者中,贝伐珠单抗的使用与否导致吻合口漏发生率显著不同[无贝伐珠单抗:111 例中的 15 例(13.5%);贝伐珠单抗:8 例中的 4 例(50.0%),p=0.007]。肠段肿瘤阳性切缘是独立的预后因素(相对风险=6.3;95%置信区间 3.1-12.9)。
在本数据集,在接受减瘤手术治疗的卵巢癌患者中,选择性使用保护性回肠造口术可能降低肠切除术后吻合口漏的发生率。特别是在接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者中,应考虑行保护性回肠造口术。吻合口漏发生率对总生存率无显著影响。