Suppr超能文献

面瘫时神经电图复合肌肉动作电位潜伏期的改变。

Latency shift in compound muscle action potentials during electroneurography in facial palsy.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan.

Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Care, Tenri Health Care University, Tenri, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;276(12):3281-3286. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05634-y. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electroneurography (ENoG) reliably predicts the prognosis of facial palsy. However, the results of ENoG are dependent on the location, where the wave is detected, as a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) arising from the facial muscles. To minimize errors in prognostic prediction, we analysed the latencies of facial CMAPs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with unilateral peripheral facial palsy and 24 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Amplitudes, negative peak latencies (NPL), and rise latencies (RL) of CMAPs were measured on the paralysed and healthy sides in patients and in healthy volunteers. The relationships of these latencies with ENoG values and the lowest House-Brackmann (H-B) scores were also analysed.

RESULTS

The amplitude of CMAP on the paralysed side was smaller, and NPL and RL were longer, than those on the healthy side in patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.01). In patients, there was no difference in NPL between the ENoG < 40% group and the ENoG ≥ 40% group. Conversely, there was a significant difference in RL between the ENoG < 40% group and ENoG ≥ 40% group (p = 0.03). No relationships were observed between NPL or RL and the lowest H-B score.

CONCLUSIONS

NPL and RL of CMAP on the paralysed side were equivalent or longer than those on the healthy side. During ENoG for facial palsy, CMAP should be measured on the healthy side first, and then detected (and the amplitude measured) on the paralysed side with reference to CMAP latency on the healthy side, to reduce errors in detecting facial CMAPs.

摘要

目的

神经电图(ENoG)可可靠地预测面瘫的预后。然而,ENoG 的结果取决于检测位置,即来自面肌的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)。为了最大限度地减少预后预测中的错误,我们分析了面肌 CMAP 的潜伏期。

材料和方法

纳入 57 例单侧周围性面瘫患者和 24 例健康志愿者。在患者和健康志愿者中,测量麻痹侧和健康侧 CMAP 的幅度、负峰潜伏期(NPL)和上升潜伏期(RL)。还分析了这些潜伏期与 ENoG 值和最低 House-Brackmann(H-B)评分的关系。

结果

患者麻痹侧 CMAP 的幅度较小,NPL 和 RL 较长,与患者和健康志愿者的健康侧相比(p<0.01)。在患者中,ENoG<40%组和 ENoG≥40%组之间 NPL 无差异。相反,ENoG<40%组和 ENoG≥40%组之间 RL 有显著差异(p=0.03)。NPL 或 RL 与最低 H-B 评分之间无相关性。

结论

麻痹侧 CMAP 的 NPL 和 RL 与健康侧相当或更长。在对面瘫进行 ENoG 时,应先在健康侧测量 CMAP,然后在麻痹侧检测(并参考健康侧的 CMAP 潜伏期测量幅度),以减少对面肌 CMAP 检测的误差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验