Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA.
Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):e45-e51. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) utilization increases, arthroplasties of multiple joints in a patient are more common. An understanding of the success of shoulder arthroplasty patients also requiring a lower-extremity (hip or knee) TJA is lacking. We evaluated the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in the revision risk following shoulder arthroplasty in patients who also undergo a lower-extremity TJA compared with those who do not? (2) Does the revision risk differ depending on the sequence of the procedures?
Patients who underwent elective primary shoulder arthroplasty from 2009 through 2015 were identified using Kaiser Permanente's shoulder arthroplasty registry. Patients with a lower-extremity TJA were identified using the institution's total joint replacement registry. Revision related to the index shoulder was modeled via Cox regression stratified by procedure type and adjusted for confounders.
Of the 4751 shoulder arthroplasties identified, 1285 (27.0%) underwent a prior hip and/or knee arthroplasty and 483 (10.2%) underwent a hip and/or knee arthroplasty following the index shoulder arthroplasty. No difference was found in all-cause shoulder revision risk with lower-extremity TJA before (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.96) or after (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.06) the index shoulder arthroplasty compared with patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty only.
In our study sample, we did not observe shoulder revision surgery risk to be different in patients who also underwent a lower-extremity TJA, regardless of the sequence of the 2 procedures. Future prospective studies should investigate whether the timing of the lower-extremity TJA in relation to the shoulder procedure impacts the latter's success.
随着全关节置换术(TJA)的应用增加,患者中多个关节的关节置换术更为常见。对于需要进行下肢(髋关节或膝关节)TJA 的同时进行肩部 TJA 的患者,其手术成功情况尚不清楚。我们评估了以下问题:(1)与未行下肢 TJA 的患者相比,行肩部 TJA 后行下肢 TJA 的患者翻修风险是否存在差异?(2)手术顺序是否会影响翻修风险?
使用 Kaiser Permanente 的肩部关节置换登记处确定 2009 年至 2015 年期间行择期初次肩部关节置换术的患者。通过机构的全关节置换登记处确定行下肢 TJA 的患者。通过 Cox 回归模型,按手术类型分层并调整混杂因素,对与指数肩相关的翻修进行建模。
在 4751 例肩部关节置换术患者中,1285 例(27.0%)患者行过髋关节和/或膝关节置换术,483 例(10.2%)患者在指数肩关节置换术后行髋关节和/或膝关节置换术。与仅行肩部关节置换术的患者相比,行下肢 TJA 对指数肩关节置换术前(危险比,1.38;95%置信区间,0.97-1.96)或术后(危险比,1.30;95%置信区间,0.82-2.06)全因肩部翻修风险无差异。
在我们的研究样本中,我们观察到,无论 2 种手术的顺序如何,同时行下肢 TJA 的患者肩部翻修手术风险并无不同。未来的前瞻性研究应调查下肢 TJA 与肩部手术的时间关系是否会影响后者的成功。