Emergency Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Cardiology and Intensive Care Unit, Nippon Medical School Musashi-Kosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan; INSERM UMR-S 942, Paris, France.
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;7(10):834-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
This study investigated whether systemic corticosteroids (new onset) administered to patients with acute heart failure (AHF) have any association with outcomes, with differentiated analyses for patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a comorbidity.
Patients with undiagnosed dyspnea frequently receive corticosteroids in emergency departments while determining a final diagnosis, but their effect on the outcomes of patients with AHF without overt COPD exacerbation is unknown.
We selected patients with AHF from the EAHFE (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Departments) registry, recording key data (new-onset corticosteroid therapy, COPD condition). Patients with and without COPD were analyzed separately. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted ratios for corticosteroid-treated compared with corticosteroid-untreated patients for 2 coprimary endpoints: 90-day all-cause mortality (from index episode) and 90-day post-discharge combined endpoint (all-cause mortality or readmission for AHF), with intermediate time-point estimations. Other secondary endpoints were calculated, and some sensitive and stratified analyses were performed.
We analyzed 11,356 patients: 8,635 without COPD (841 corticosteroid-treated, 9.7%) and 2,721 with COPD (753 corticosteroid-treated, 27.7%). There were several differences between treated and untreated patients, essentially because corticosteroid-treated patients were sicker. Although unadjusted outcomes were worse in corticosteroid-treated patients, especially in patients without COPD, these differences disappeared after adjustment: hazard ratios for 90-day mortality (without/with COPD) were 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76 to 1.10)/0.99 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.26), and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.93 to 1.28)/1.02 (95% CI: 0.86 to 1.21) for the post-discharge combined endpoint. Analyses of intermediate time-point coprimary endpoints and secondary outcomes rendered similar estimations. Sensitivity and stratified analysis did not significantly modify these results.
There is no evidence of harm related to the new onset of systemic corticosteroid therapy during an episode of AHF, either in patients with or without concomitant COPD.
本研究旨在探讨急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者接受全身皮质类固醇(新发病例)治疗与结局的相关性,并对合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和不合并 COPD 的患者进行差异化分析。
在确定最终诊断时,急诊科经常会给未确诊呼吸困难的患者使用皮质类固醇,但皮质类固醇对无明显 COPD 加重的 AHF 患者结局的影响尚不清楚。
我们从 EAHFE(急诊科急性心力衰竭的流行病学)登记处中选择 AHF 患者,记录关键数据(新发病例皮质类固醇治疗、COPD 情况)。分别对合并和不合并 COPD 的患者进行分析。我们计算了皮质类固醇治疗组与未治疗组的 2 个主要终点的未经调整和调整比值:90 天全因死亡率(从首发事件开始)和 90 天出院后复合终点(全因死亡率或因 AHF 再次入院),并进行中间时间点估计。计算了其他次要终点,并进行了一些敏感和分层分析。
我们分析了 11356 例患者:8635 例无 COPD(841 例皮质类固醇治疗,9.7%)和 2721 例合并 COPD(753 例皮质类固醇治疗,27.7%)。在接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者之间存在一些差异,这主要是因为皮质类固醇治疗组的患者病情更严重。尽管未经调整的结局在皮质类固醇治疗组患者中更差,尤其是在无 COPD 的患者中,但这些差异在调整后消失:90 天死亡率的风险比(无/合并 COPD)为 0.91(95%置信区间:0.76 至 1.10)/0.99(95%置信区间:0.78 至 1.26),出院后复合终点的风险比为 1.09(95%置信区间:0.93 至 1.28)/1.02(95%置信区间:0.86 至 1.21)。中间时间点主要终点和次要结局的分析得出了类似的估计值。敏感性和分层分析并没有显著改变这些结果。
在 AHF 发作期间,新发病例全身皮质类固醇治疗与危害之间没有证据,无论是在合并或不合并 COPD 的患者中。