Department of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica Del Perú, Lima, Perú.
J Prev Interv Community. 2021 Oct-Dec;49(4):366-384. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1664713. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
The construction of collective memory with regard to (Internal Armed Conflict CAI) -violence that occurred in Perú between 1980 and 2000- is still a challenge that produces disputes and tension. It has been studied mostly by social scientists, from the point of view of 'memory' studies. Despite the great explanatory power of Psychology in understanding these type of processes, its contribution has mainly focused on mental health. Education has been the least researched area, despite the role the Truth and Reconciliation Committee attributed to education in schools and universities, in constructing memories about war. In this context, we reflect on the role of Psychology on constructing collective memory in educational settings. Starting from Hallbach´s classic theory of collective memory, to contributions from cognitive psychology and post-traumatic growth studies, we analyze two experiences in educational contexts with the purpose of proposing some guidelines for research and intervention.
(内战 CAI)-1980 年至 2000 年期间在秘鲁发生的暴力事件-的集体记忆的构建仍然是一个具有争议和紧张的挑战。社会科学家主要从“记忆”研究的角度对此进行了研究。尽管心理学在理解这些类型的过程方面具有很大的解释力,但它的贡献主要集中在心理健康方面。教育是研究最少的领域,尽管真相与和解委员会在学校和大学中赋予教育在构建战争记忆方面的作用。在这种情况下,我们反思心理学在教育环境中构建集体记忆的作用。从哈巴赫(Hallbach)的经典集体记忆理论到认知心理学和创伤后成长研究的贡献,我们分析了教育背景下的两个经验,旨在为研究和干预提出一些指导方针。