Suppr超能文献

生物类似药时代中,采用现代优化策略的初始免疫调节剂或英夫利昔单抗治疗克罗恩病的成本效益分析。

The Cost-effectiveness of Initial Immunomodulators or Infliximab Using Modern Optimization Strategies for Crohn's Disease in the Biosimilar Era.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Feb 11;26(3):369-379. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz159.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment cost, efficacy, and safety are integral considerations when optimizing management of Crohn's disease (CD). This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of initial immunomodulator and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents for the treatment of CD from a US third-party perspective, incorporating current treatment algorithms, optimization strategies, and reduced costs availed by biosimilars.

METHOD

A 1-year Markov model was developed to simulate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of initial azathioprine, infliximab, and combination therapy for moderate to severe CD. Treatment was changed based on tolerability and clinical disease activity at 3-monthly intervals. Efficacy data were based on published literature.

RESULTS

Initial azathioprine had the lowest cost and utility ($35,337 and 0.63 QALYs), whereas combination therapy was the costliest yet conferred the highest health benefits ($57,638 and 0.67 QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness of infliximab and combination therapy compared with azathioprine were both in excess of $500,000 per QALY gained. Initial azathioprine remained the most cost-effective treatment on sensitivity analysis compared with infliximab and combination therapy, with 90% reductions in anti-TNF therapy costs and a 5-year time horizon, although combination therapy had an acceptable cost-effectiveness when costs were reduced in the extended model. Initial infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab were dominated by combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the biosimilar era, initial azathioprine with escalation to infliximab appeared more cost-effective in the short term compared with infliximab or combination therapy, although initial combination therapy yields acceptable ICERs in the long term with continued reductions in anti-TNF therapy costs and will likely be the preferred treatment strategy in the future.

摘要

背景

在优化克罗恩病(CD)的管理时,治疗费用、疗效和安全性是综合考虑的因素。本研究从美国第三方角度评估了初始免疫调节剂和抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)药物治疗 CD 的成本效益,纳入了当前的治疗方案、优化策略以及生物类似药带来的降低成本。

方法

开发了一个为期 1 年的 Markov 模型,以模拟中度至重度 CD 初始使用硫唑嘌呤、英夫利昔单抗和联合治疗的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。根据耐受性和临床疾病活动,每 3 个月调整一次治疗。疗效数据基于已发表的文献。

结果

初始硫唑嘌呤的成本和效用最低(分别为 35337 美元和 0.63 QALYs),而联合治疗的成本最高,但提供的健康效益最高(57638 美元和 0.67 QALYs)。与硫唑嘌呤相比,英夫利昔单抗和联合治疗的增量成本效益均超过 50 万美元/QALY。与英夫利昔单抗和联合治疗相比,在敏感性分析中,初始硫唑嘌呤仍然是最具成本效益的治疗方法,抗 TNF 治疗成本降低 90%,5 年时间范围内,尽管在扩展模型中降低成本时,联合治疗具有可接受的成本效益。初始英夫利昔单抗、乌司奴单抗和维得利珠单抗均被联合治疗所超越。

结论

在生物类似药时代,与英夫利昔单抗或联合治疗相比,初始硫唑嘌呤加用英夫利昔单抗在短期内更具成本效益,尽管随着抗 TNF 治疗成本的持续降低以及在未来可能成为首选的治疗策略,长期来看初始联合治疗具有可接受的 ICER。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验