Bashir Naazish S, Hughes Avery, Ungar Wendy J
Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Feb 24;8(1):23814683231156433. doi: 10.1177/23814683231156433. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
Policies mandating the use of lower cost biosimilars in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have created concerns for patients who prefer their original biologic. To inform the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar infliximab treatment in IBD by systematically reviewing the effect of infliximab price variation on cost-effectiveness for jurisdictional decision making. MEDLINE, Embase, Healthstar, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Mental Measurements Yearbook citation databases, PEDE, CEA registry, HTA agencies. Economic evaluations of infliximab for adult or pediatric Crohn's disease and/or ulcerative colitis published from 1998 through 2019 in which drug price was varied in sensitivity analysis were included. Study characteristics, main findings, and results of drug price sensitivity analyses were extracted. Studies were critically appraised. The cost-effective price of infliximab was determined based on the stated willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds for each jurisdiction. Infliximab price was examined in sensitivity analysis in 31 studies. Infliximab showed favorable cost-effectiveness at a price ranging from CAD $66 to $1,260 per vial, depending on jurisdiction. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated cost-effectiveness ratios above the jurisdictional WTP threshold. Drug prices were not always reported separately, WTP thresholds varied, and funding sources were not consistently reported. Despite the high cost of infliximab, few economic evaluations examined price variation, limiting the ability to infer the effects of biosimilar introduction. Alternative pricing strategies and access to treatment could be considered to enable IBD patients to maintain access to their current medications.
In an effort to reduce public drug expenditures, Canadian and other jurisdictional drug plans have mandated the use of lower cost, but similarly effective, biosimilars in patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease or require a nonmedical switch for established patients. This switch has created concerns for patients and clinicians who want to maintain the ability to make treatment decisions and remain with the original biologic.It is customary for economic evaluations to assess the robustness of results to variations in high-cost items such as medications. In the absence of economic evaluations of biosimilars, examining biologic drug price in sensitivity analysis provides insight into the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar alternatives. A total of 31 economic evaluations of infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease varied the infliximab price in sensitivity analysis.The infliximab price deemed to be cost-effective within each study ranged from CAD $66 to CAD $1,260 per 100-mg vial. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio above the jurisdictional willingness-to-pay threshold. If policy decisions are based on price, then originator manufacturers could consider reducing the price or negotiating alternative pricing models to enable patients with inflammatory bowel disease to remain on their current medications.
要求在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中使用成本较低的生物类似药的政策,引发了那些更倾向于使用原研生物药的患者的担忧。通过系统回顾英夫利昔单抗价格变化对成本效益的影响,为生物类似药英夫利昔单抗治疗IBD的成本效益提供信息,以用于辖区决策。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Healthstar、综合与补充医学、乔安娜·布里格斯循证医学数据库、国际药学文摘、健康与心理社会测量工具、心理测量年鉴引文数据库、PEDE、成本效果分析注册库、卫生技术评估机构。纳入1998年至2019年发表的针对成人或儿童克罗恩病和/或溃疡性结肠炎的英夫利昔单抗的经济评估,这些评估在敏感性分析中改变了药物价格。提取了研究特征、主要发现以及药物价格敏感性分析结果。对研究进行了严格评价。根据每个辖区规定的支付意愿(WTP)阈值确定英夫利昔单抗的成本效益价格。在31项研究的敏感性分析中考察了英夫利昔单抗价格。根据辖区不同,英夫利昔单抗每瓶价格在66加元至1260加元之间时显示出良好的成本效益。共有18项研究(58%)显示成本效益比高于辖区WTP阈值。药物价格并非总是单独报告,WTP阈值各不相同,且资金来源报告也不一致。尽管英夫利昔单抗成本高昂,但很少有经济评估考察价格变化,限制了推断生物类似药引入效果的能力。可以考虑替代定价策略和治疗可及性,以使IBD患者能够继续使用他们目前的药物。
为了减少公共药物支出,加拿大和其他辖区的药物计划要求在新诊断的炎症性肠病患者中使用成本较低但效果类似的生物类似药,或要求现有患者进行非医学换药。这种换药引发了患者和临床医生的担忧,他们希望能够继续做出治疗决策并使用原研生物药。经济评估通常会评估结果对药物等高成本项目变化的稳健性。在缺乏生物类似药经济评估的情况下,在敏感性分析中考察生物药价格可洞察生物类似药替代品的成本效益。共有31项英夫利昔单抗治疗炎症性肠病的经济评估在敏感性分析中改变了英夫利昔单抗价格。每项研究中被认为具有成本效益的英夫利昔单抗价格为每100毫克瓶66加元至1260加元。共有18项研究(58%)显示增量成本效益比高于辖区支付意愿阈值。如果政策决策基于价格,那么原研药制造商可以考虑降低价格或协商替代定价模式,以使炎症性肠病患者能够继续使用他们目前的药物。