Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Nov 22;57(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01347-19. Print 2019 Dec.
The laboratory diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is mainly performed with interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs). We compared the performance of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based IGRA, the Standard E TB-Feron ELISA (TBF; SD Biosensor, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), with that of a widely used assay, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay (QFT-GIT; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), in a population of 425 health care workers (HCWs). All HCWs were screened by both assays per the manufacturers' protocols and in a cross-manner, where tube sets from one assay were used with the alternative ELISA. The results were compared both qualitatively and quantitatively. TBF and QFT-GIT identified 11.3% (48/425) and 12.9% (55/425) of the positive samples, respectively. TBF demonstrated 81.6% positive and 97.4% negative percent agreement with QFT-GIT, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.78 (strong agreement). Discordant results were detected in 20 subjects (4.3%): 13 samples (65.0%) were TBF negative and QFT-GIT positive, 6 samples (30.0%) were TBF positive and QFT-GIT negative, and 1 sample provided TBF and QFT-GIT indeterminate/negative results. We observed a statistically significant degree of correlation between the interferon gamma reactivity between the two assays (Spearman's rho [ ] value 0.551, 0.01) and between standard assays and cross-manner tests ( value range, 0.449 to 0.816; 0.01 for all combinations). Cross-manner tests also revealed that the ELISA kit of TBF provided higher values for the tube containing the tuberculosis (TB) antigen and the negative-control tube than the ELISA of QFT-GIT under the same conditions (0.01), although these differences disappeared when the value for the negative-control tube was subtracted from that for the TB antigen tube. TBF showed a comparable and acceptable clinical performance in detecting LTBI compared to QFT-GIT. TBF represents a useful alternative tool as an ELISA-based IGRA, especially for large-scale screening for LTBI in HCWs.
本研究旨在比较一种新型酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)- 基于干扰素伽马释放试验(IGRA)的 Standard E TB-Feron ELISA(TBF;SD Biosensor,韩国京畿道)与广泛使用的 QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay(QFT-GIT;Qiagen,德国希尔德斯海姆)在 425 名医护人员(HCWs)中的性能。根据制造商的方案和交叉方式,所有 HCWs 均使用两种检测方法进行了筛查,其中一种检测方法的试剂盒与另一种 ELISA 一起使用。对结果进行了定性和定量比较。TBF 和 QFT-GIT 分别鉴定出 425 名 HCWs 中的 11.3%(48/425)和 12.9%(55/425)为阳性样本。TBF 与 QFT-GIT 的阳性百分比符合率为 81.6%,阴性百分比符合率为 97.4%,Cohen's kappa 值为 0.78(强符合)。在 20 名受试者(4.3%)中检测到了不一致的结果:13 个样本(65.0%)为 TBF 阴性和 QFT-GIT 阳性,6 个样本(30.0%)为 TBF 阳性和 QFT-GIT 阴性,1 个样本为 TBF 和 QFT-GIT 不确定/阴性结果。两种检测方法之间的干扰素伽马反应(Spearman's rho [ ] 值为 0.551,0.01)和标准检测方法与交叉方式检测之间存在显著的相关性( 值范围为 0.449 至 0.816;所有组合均为 0.01)。交叉方式检测还表明,在相同条件下,TBF 的 ELISA 试剂盒比 QFT-GIT 的 ELISA 试剂盒提供了更高的结核抗原管和阴性对照管的检测值(0.01),尽管当从结核抗原管中减去阴性对照管的值时,这些差异消失了。TBF 在检测 LTBI 方面与 QFT-GIT 具有可比且可接受的临床性能。TBF 是一种基于 ELISA 的 IGRA 的有用替代工具,特别是在 HCWs 中进行 LTBI 的大规模筛查。