Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jun 25;56(7). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00614-18. Print 2018 Jul.
The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) received FDA clearance in 2017 and will replace the prior version of the assay, the QFT-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). Here, we compared performances of the QFT-Plus assay and the QFT-GIT version in a diverse patient population, including patients undergoing evaluation for or follow-up of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI; = 39) or active TB infection ( = 3), and in health care workers (HCWs; = 119) at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Compared to the QFT-GIT, the QFT-Plus assay showed 91.2% (31/34) positive, 98.4% (124/126) negative, and 96.6% (156/161) overall qualitative agreement among the 161 enrolled subjects, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.91 (excellent interrater agreement). Among the 28 patients diagnosed with LTBI at the time of enrollment, the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays agreed in 24 (85.7%) patients; in all four discordant patients, the positivity of the QFT-GIT or QFT-Plus IGRA was associated with low-level interferon gamma (IFN-γ) reactivity, ranging from 0.36 IU/ml to 0.66 IU/ml. Additionally, we document a high degree of correlation between IFN-γ levels in the QFT-GIT TB antigen tube and each of the two QFT-Plus TB antigen tubes, as well as between the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 tubes (Pearson's correlation coefficients [] > 0.95). Overall, we show comparable results between the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays in our study population composed of subjects presenting with a diverse spectrum of TB infections. Our findings suggest that the necessary transition to the QFT-Plus assay will be associated with a minimal difference in assay performance characteristics.
QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus(QFT-Plus; Qiagen,Germantown,MD)干扰素释放试验(IGRA)于 2017 年获得 FDA 批准,并将取代之前的 QFT-Gold In-Tube(QFT-GIT)版本。在这里,我们比较了 QFT-Plus 检测和 QFT-GIT 版本在不同患者人群中的表现,包括接受潜伏性结核感染(LTBI; = 39)或活动性结核感染评估或随访的患者( = 3),以及梅奥诊所(罗切斯特,MN)的卫生保健工作者(HCWs; = 119)。与 QFT-GIT 相比,QFT-Plus 检测在 161 名入组受试者中分别有 91.2%(31/34)、98.4%(124/126)和 96.6%(156/161)的阳性、阴性和总定性一致,Cohen's kappa 值为 0.91(极好的评分者间一致性)。在入组时诊断为 LTBI 的 28 名患者中,QFT-GIT 和 QFT-Plus 检测在 24 名(85.7%)患者中一致;在所有四个不一致的患者中,QFT-GIT 或 QFT-Plus IGRA 的阳性与低水平干扰素γ(IFN-γ)反应相关,范围为 0.36IU/ml 至 0.66IU/ml。此外,我们还记录了 QFT-GIT TB 抗原管中的 IFN-γ水平与 QFT-Plus 两种 TB 抗原管中每一种的高度相关性,以及 QFT-Plus TB1 和 TB2 管之间的高度相关性(皮尔逊相关系数[]>0.95)。总的来说,我们在由具有不同结核病感染谱的患者组成的研究人群中显示了 QFT-GIT 和 QFT-Plus 检测之间的可比结果。我们的研究结果表明,向 QFT-Plus 检测的必要过渡将与检测性能特征的微小差异相关。