Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Infectious Disease, The United Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Yamaguchi University, Yoshida, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
J Virol. 2019 Nov 26;93(24). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01324-19. Print 2019 Dec 15.
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) of domestic cats (ERV-DCs) are one of the youngest feline ERV groups in domestic cats (); some members are replication competent (ERV-DC10, ERV-DC18, and ERV-DC14), produce the antiretroviral soluble factor Refrex-1 (ERV-DC7 and ERV-DC16), or can generate recombinant feline leukemia virus (FeLV). Here, we investigated ERV-DC in European wildcats () and detected four loci: ERV-DC6, ERV-DC7, ERV-DC14, and ERV-DC16. ERV-DC14 was detected at a high frequency in European wildcats; however, it was replication defective due to a single G → A nucleotide substitution, resulting in an E148K substitution in the ERV-DC14 envelope (Env). This mutation results in a cleavage-defective Env that is not incorporated into viral particles. Introduction of the same mutation into feline and murine infectious gammaretroviruses resulted in a similar Env dysfunction. Interestingly, the same mutation was found in an FeLV isolate from naturally occurring thymic lymphoma and a mouse ERV, suggesting a common mechanism of virus inactivation. Refrex-1 was present in European wildcats; however, ERV-DC16, but not ERV-DC7, was unfixed in European wildcats. Thus, Refrex-1 has had an antiviral role throughout the evolution of the genus , predating cat exposure to feline retroviruses. ERV-DC sequence diversity was present across wild and domestic cats but was locus dependent. In conclusion, ERVs have evolved species-specific phenotypes through the interplay between ERVs and their hosts. The mechanism of viral inactivation may be similar irrespective of the evolutionary history of retroviruses. The tracking of ancestral retroviruses can shed light on their roles in pathogenesis and host-virus evolution. Domestic cats () were domesticated from wildcats approximately 9,000 years ago via close interaction between humans and cats. During cat evolution, various exogenous retroviruses infected different cat lineages and generated numerous ERVs in the host genome, some of which remain replication competent. Here, we detected several ERV-DC loci in Notably, a species-specific single nucleotide polymorphism in the ERV-DC14 gene, which results in a replication-defective product, is highly prevalent in European wildcats, unlike the replication-competent ERV-DC14 that is commonly present in domestic cats. The presence of the same lethal mutation in the genes of both FeLV and murine ERV provides a common mechanism shared by endogenous and exogenous retroviruses by which ERVs can be inactivated after endogenization. The antiviral role of Refrex-1 predates cat exposure to feline retroviruses. The existence of two ERV-DC14 phenotypes provides a unique model for understanding both ERV fate and cat domestication.
内源性逆转录病毒(ERVs)是家猫中最年轻的猫科动物 ERV 群体之一();其中一些成员具有复制能力(ERV-DC10、ERV-DC18 和 ERV-DC14),产生抗逆转录病毒可溶性因子 Refrex-1(ERV-DC7 和 ERV-DC16),或可产生重组猫白血病病毒(FeLV)。在这里,我们研究了欧洲野猫中的 ERV-DC,并检测到四个基因座:ERV-DC6、ERV-DC7、ERV-DC14 和 ERV-DC16。ERV-DC14 在欧洲野猫中高频检出;然而,由于单个 G→A 核苷酸替换,它的复制能力丧失,导致 ERV-DC14 包膜中的 E148K 替换。这种突变导致切割缺陷的包膜不能被包裹到病毒粒子中。将相同的突变引入猫和鼠传染性γ逆转录病毒中,导致类似的包膜功能障碍。有趣的是,在自然发生的胸腺瘤的 FeLV 分离株和鼠 ERV 中也发现了相同的突变,提示存在一种共同的病毒失活机制。Refrex-1 存在于欧洲野猫中;然而,ERV-DC16 而非 ERV-DC7 在欧洲野猫中未固定。因此,Refrex-1 在属的进化过程中一直具有抗病毒作用,早于猫接触猫科逆转录病毒。ERV-DC 序列多样性存在于野生和家猫中,但依赖于基因座。总之,ERV 通过 ERV 与其宿主之间的相互作用,进化出了具有物种特异性的表型。病毒失活的机制可能与逆转录病毒的进化历史无关。追踪祖先逆转录病毒可以揭示它们在发病机制和宿主-病毒进化中的作用。家猫()大约在 9000 年前通过人类与猫的密切互动,从野猫中驯化而来。在猫的进化过程中,各种外源性逆转录病毒感染了不同的猫谱系,并在宿主基因组中产生了大量的 ERV,其中一些仍然具有复制能力。在这里,我们在 中检测到了几个 ERV-DC 基因座。值得注意的是,ERV-DC14 基因中的一个物种特异性单核苷酸多态性,导致产生具有复制缺陷的产物,在欧洲野猫中非常普遍,而在常见的具有复制能力的 ERV-DC14 中则不常见。FeLV 和鼠 ERV 的 基因中存在相同的致死突变,为内源性和外源性逆转录病毒提供了一种共同的机制,通过这种机制,逆转录病毒在内源性化后可以失活。Refrex-1 的抗病毒作用早于猫接触猫科逆转录病毒。Refrex-1 的存在预示着猫接触猫科逆转录病毒之前就具有抗病毒作用。两种 ERV-DC14 表型的存在为理解 ERV 的命运和猫的驯化提供了一个独特的模型。