• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Options for Dialing Down From Single Payer.从单一支付者模式转变的选择。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1517-1520. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
You Can't Make Me Do It, but I Could Be Persuaded: A Federalism Perspective on the Affordable Care Act.你无法强迫我这么做,但我可能会被说服:从联邦制视角看《平价医疗法案》
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):281-323. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882219. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
3
Turmoil in the Individual Insurance Market - Where It Came From and How to Fix It.个人保险市场的动荡——其根源及解决办法
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):314-315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707593. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
Business of Health: Business of Health Insurance.健康业务:健康保险业务。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2017 Dec 26;2017:1-105.
5
State efforts to promote continuity of coverage and care under the Affordable Care Act.国家努力根据《平价医疗法案》促进参保的连续性和医疗服务的连续性。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Dec;38(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2373184. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
6
Republican States Bolstered Their Health Insurance Rate Review Programs Using Incentives From the Affordable Care Act.共和党州利用《平价医疗法案》的激励措施加强了他们的健康保险费率审查计划。
Inquiry. 2015 Sep 21;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015604164. Print 2015.
7
Mitigating the effects of churning under the Affordable Care Act: lessons from Medicaid.减轻《平价医疗法案》下人员频繁变动的影响:来自医疗补助计划的经验教训。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Jun;12:1-8.
8
The Supreme Court's historic ruling on the Affordable Care Act: economic sustainability and universal coverage.最高法院关于《平价医疗法案》的历史性裁决:经济可持续性与全民医保覆盖
JAMA. 2012 Aug 8;308(6):571-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9061.
9
An American approach to health system reform.美国的医疗体系改革之路。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2537-40.
10
Interest Group Conflict Over Medicaid Expansion: The Surprising Impact of Public Advocates.医疗补助扩大计划中的利益集团冲突:公共倡导者的惊人影响
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):308-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302943. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform.在医疗改革不断发展的时代,对边缘化群体进行癌症基因检测。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100275. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
A Path Forward: Mental Health and the U.S. Pandemic Response.前进之路:心理健康与美国大流行病应对。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;48(2):161-170. doi: 10.1007/s11414-020-09747-9. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Problems paying medical bills and mental health symptoms post-Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后支付医疗账单的问题与心理健康症状
AIMS Public Health. 2020 May 6;7(2):274-286. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020023. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicaid Work Requirements - Results from the First Year in Arkansas.医疗补助工作要求——阿肯色州第一年的结果
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 12;381(11):1073-1082. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1901772. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
Maryland Total Cost of Care Model: Transforming Health and Health Care.马里兰医疗总费用模式:变革健康与医疗保健
JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):939-940. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0895.
3
Medicaid Expansion Gains Momentum: Postelection Prospects and Potential Implications.医疗补助扩大计划势头渐起:选举后的前景及潜在影响
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):241-242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20484.
4
How Democratic Candidates For The Presidency In 2020 Could Choose Among Public Health Insurance Plans.2020 年美国总统大选候选人如何在公共医疗保险计划中做出选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2084-2091. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05082. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Access and Self-Assessed Health After 3 Years.《平价医疗法案》实施三年后对医疗保健可及性和自我评估健康状况的影响。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018796361. doi: 10.1177/0046958018796361.
6
Questions for New Single-Payer Advocates.给新的单一支付者倡导者的问题。
Milbank Q. 2017 Dec;95(4):702-705. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12288. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
7
United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps.美国医疗保健改革:迄今取得的进展及后续步骤。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):525-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9797.
8
Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes (COSTS).分而治之:保护医疗保健收入(成本)增长。
Health Econ. 2012 Jan;21(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/hec.1813.

从单一支付者模式转变的选择。

Options for Dialing Down From Single Payer.

机构信息

Sherry Glied is with the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1517-1520. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299
PMID:31536411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6775905/
Abstract

There are formidable institutional obstacles to passing a single-payer health program in the United States. Advocates should consider incremental improvements that may better match legislative realities. There are three potential directions for incremental coverage policy.One possibility is to build on the successes of the Affordable Care Act; this might include rolling back regulatory changes, further incentivizing Medicaid expansion, enhancing coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and imposing regulations on private employer-based insurance to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable coverage that provides adequate financial security. A second direction is to offer more publicly sponsored insurance options, which might involve offering a public option to those eligible for marketplace coverage, creating a Medicare or Medicaid buy-in program, lowering the eligibility age for Medicare, or developing a public plan that serves as a default for those who do not choose to buy alternative private coverage. A third direction is to build on federalism, offering states incentives to expand coverage.Federal and state legislators could also consider incremental cost-containment steps, such as rate setting.

摘要

在美国,通过单一支付者健康计划存在巨大的制度障碍。倡导者应该考虑可能更好地适应立法现实的渐进式改进。渐进式覆盖政策有三个潜在方向。一种可能性是借鉴《平价医疗法案》的成功经验;这可能包括撤销监管改革,进一步激励扩大医疗补助,加强《平价医疗法案》市场的覆盖范围,并对私营雇主为基础的保险施加规定,以确保所有美国人都能获得负担得起的、提供足够财务保障的保险。另一个方向是提供更多由公共资助的保险选择,这可能涉及为有资格获得市场保险的人提供公共选择,创建医疗保险或医疗补助加入计划,降低医疗保险的资格年龄,或制定一个公共计划,作为那些选择不购买替代私人保险的人的默认选择。第三个方向是在联邦制的基础上进一步发展,为各州提供扩大覆盖范围的激励措施。联邦和州立法者也可以考虑逐步采取成本控制措施,例如设定费率。