Deschamps Kevin, Matricali Giovanni, Eerdekens Maarten, Wuite Sander, Leardini Alberto, Staes Filip
KU Leuven.
Institut D'Enseignement Supérieur Parnasse Deux-Alice.
J Appl Biomech. 2019 Oct 1;35(5):336-343. doi: 10.1123/jab.2018-0442.
Foot structure and kinematics have long been considered as risk factors for foot and lower-limb running injuries. The authors aimed at investigating foot joint kinetics to unravel their receptive and propulsive characteristics while running barefoot, both with rearfoot and with midfoot striking strategies. Power absorption and generation occurring at different joints of the foot in 6 asymptomatic adults were calculated using both a 3-segment and a 4-segment kinetic model. An inverse dynamic approach was used to quantify mechanical power. Major power absorption and generation characteristics were observed at the ankle joint complex as well as at the Chopart joint in both the rearfoot and the midfoot striking strategies. The power at the Lisfranc joint, quantified by the 4-segment kinetic model, was predominantly generated in both strategies, and at the toes, it was absorbed. The overall results show a large variability in the receptive and propulsive characteristics among the analyzed joints in both striking strategies. The present study may provide novel insight for clinical decision making to address foot and lower-limb injuries and to guide athletes in the adoption of different striking strategies during running.
足部结构和运动学长期以来一直被视为足部和下肢跑步损伤的风险因素。作者旨在研究足部关节动力学,以揭示在赤脚跑步时,采用后足着地和中足着地策略时其接受和推进的特征。使用三段和四段动力学模型计算了6名无症状成年人足部不同关节处的能量吸收和产生情况。采用逆动力学方法来量化机械能。在后足着地和中足着地策略中,在踝关节复合体以及跗中关节处均观察到主要的能量吸收和产生特征。由四段动力学模型量化的 Lisfranc 关节处的能量,在两种策略中均主要是产生的,而在脚趾处则是吸收的。总体结果表明,在两种着地策略中,所分析关节的接受和推进特征存在很大差异。本研究可能为临床决策提供新的见解,以解决足部和下肢损伤问题,并指导运动员在跑步过程中采用不同的着地策略。