Division of Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.013.
To compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and fresh embryo transfer (ET) using corifollitropin alfa in ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol.
A total of 245 unselected patients undergoing IVF/fresh ET were enrolled between January 1 and December 31, 2017, including 135 treated with ultrashort GnRHa protocol and 110 treated with antagonist protocol. The primary outcomes were number of total injections and outpatient department (OPD) visits before ovulation triggering. The secondary outcomes were the duration of stimulation, dosage of additional gonadotropin for ovarian hyperstimulation, rates of pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, live birth, ovarian response, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate.
Patients treated with ultrashort GnRHa required less additional gonadotropin, fewer total injections, but had better ovarian responses, including more oocytes retrieved, more metaphase II oocytes, and more blastocysts than those treated with antagonist did. A premature LH surge occurred only in six patients treated with antagonist protocol. The rates of pregnancy (37.0% vs. 43.6%), clinical pregnancy (25.2% vs. 34.6%), and live birth (19.3% vs. 30.0%) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The OHSS rate was similar in the two groups.
In unselected patients using corifollitropin alfa, the ultrashort GnRHa protocol needed lower dose of additional gonadotropin and fewer injections but produced similar pregnancy outcomes than antagonist protocol did, suggesting that the ultrashort GnRHa protocol could be an alternative.
比较使用促卵泡素阿尔法在超短促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)方案和 GnRH 拮抗剂方案进行体外受精(IVF)和新鲜胚胎移植(ET)的结局。
2017 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,共纳入 245 名接受 IVF/新鲜 ET 的未经选择的患者,包括 135 名接受超短 GnRHa 方案治疗和 110 名接受拮抗剂方案治疗。主要结局是排卵触发前的总注射次数和门诊就诊次数。次要结局是刺激持续时间、卵巢过度刺激所需的额外促性腺激素剂量、妊娠率、临床妊娠率、活产率、卵巢反应和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率。
与拮抗剂方案相比,接受超短 GnRHa 方案治疗的患者需要更少的额外促性腺激素、更少的总注射次数,但卵巢反应更好,包括更多的卵母细胞回收、更多的中期 II 级卵母细胞和更多的胚胎。只有 6 名接受拮抗剂方案治疗的患者出现过早的 LH 峰。两组妊娠率(37.0% vs. 43.6%)、临床妊娠率(25.2% vs. 34.6%)和活产率(19.3% vs. 30.0%)无显著差异。两组 OHSS 发生率相似。
在使用促卵泡素阿尔法的未经选择的患者中,超短 GnRHa 方案需要较低剂量的额外促性腺激素和较少的注射次数,但产生的妊娠结局与拮抗剂方案相似,表明超短 GnRHa 方案可能是一种替代方案。