Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg in Mannheim, Germany.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):439.e9-439.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Polypharmacy and multimorbidity is a threat to older people; hence, listing approaches should support physicians to optimize medication. The FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) classification of drug appropriateness for older people provides positive or negative labels: A (A-bsolutely), B (B-eneficial), C (C-areful), and D (D-on't). Based on these categories, FORTA-labeled drug lists were developed in 7 European countries or regions; the same approach was used to develop a U.S.-FORTA List reflecting the country-specific availability and usage of drugs.
DESIGN/SETTING: A 2-step Delphi-type approach was employed to add, remove, or relabel drugs from the listing proposal and to add or remove new indications. The proposal utilized the European (EURO)-FORTA list as template.
Eight US-based geriatricians/pharmacists served as raters.
Raters gave recommendations and comments on the list items.
The first U.S.-FORTA List contains 273 items aligned to 27 main indication groups; 30 drugs and drug groups were added, and 23 removed as being unavailable in the United States. The highest percentage of changes in FORTA labels as compared to the EURO-FORTA List occurred for sleep disorders associated with dementia (40%). In 8 indications, the labels for 11 items were different from the proposal. Thus, for the majority of the items (n = 232, 95.5%), the proposals were accepted by the US raters. Only 16 (6.6%) of the proposed items (n = 243) had to be re-evaluated in the second round as a result of inconsistent rating in the first round.
The U.S.-FORTA List addresses the appropriateness of drugs for older people in the United States reflecting country-specific availability, usage, and expert rating. As shown for the FORTA list in Europe, this listing approach is among the few that are clinically validated and improve well-being and geriatric outcomes. The U.S.-FORTA List now largely enhances the global availability of this approach.
背景/目的:多药治疗和多种疾病是老年人的威胁;因此,列出方法应该支持医生优化药物治疗。适合老年人的 FORTA(适合老年人的药物评估工具)药物适宜性分类提供了积极或消极的标签:A(绝对)、B(有益)、C(小心)和 D(不要)。基于这些类别,在 7 个欧洲国家或地区开发了 FORTA 标签药物清单;同样的方法被用于开发美国-FORTA 清单,以反映该国特定的药物可用性和使用情况。
设计/设置:采用两步式德尔菲型方法,从清单建议中添加、删除或重新标记药物,并添加或删除新的适应证。该提案利用欧洲(EURO)-FORTA 清单作为模板。
8 名美国老年病学家/药剂师担任评估员。
评估员对清单项目提出建议和意见。
第一个美国-FORTA 清单包含 273 项,与 27 个主要适应证组对齐;添加了 30 种药物和药物组,由于在美国不可用,删除了 23 种。与 EURO-FORTA 清单相比,FORTA 标签变化最高的是与痴呆相关的睡眠障碍(40%)。在 8 个适应证中,11 项的标签与建议不同。因此,对于大多数项目(n=232,95.5%),美国评估员接受了提案。由于第一轮评估不一致,只有 16 项(n=243)提议的项目(6.6%)需要在第二轮重新评估。
美国-FORTA 清单解决了美国老年人药物适宜性问题,反映了该国特定的可用性、使用情况和专家评估。与欧洲的 FORTA 清单一样,这种清单方法是少数经过临床验证并改善健康和老年结局的方法之一。美国-FORTA 清单现在在很大程度上增加了这种方法的全球可用性。