• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极端肿瘤整形保乳术是一种安全的新选择,可以替代乳房切除术。

Extreme oncoplastic conservation is a safe new alternative to mastectomy.

机构信息

Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Romsey Road, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 5DG, UK.

Salisbury District Hospital, Odstock Road, Salisbury, SP2 8BJ, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.004
PMID:31543385
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Extreme oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (eOPBCS) allows breast conservation for tumours ≥ 50 mm, but long-term outcomes are unclear. We investigated early complications and the longer-term clinical and oncological outcomes following eOPBCS to assess the clinical utility and safety of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively collected database of all eOPBCS procedures (1993-2016) using LD miniflaps (LDm) and therapeutic mammoplasties (TM) was interrogated and cross-checked with hospital records to establish length of follow up (FU), clinical outcomes (complications, revisions), local recurrence (LR) and survival.

RESULTS

Ninety eOPBCS procedures (62 LDm, 28 TM) performed for large tumours (mean 67 [50-177] mm) were identified, overall FU 80 (10-308) months (LDm 91 [13-308], TM 54 [10-120] months). Forty two per cent were node positive, and 2 were benign (benign cases excluded from LR and FU analysis). Eleven patients required surgery for involved excision margins (LDm 3 re-excisions and 2 mastectomies, TM 6 mastectomies). Surgery for complications and subsequent revision was required in 6% and 37% of LDm and 18% and 7% of TM patients, respectively. Seven patients developed LR (LDm 5 versus TM 2) giving a predicted 5 and 10 year LR rate of 1.1% and 16%.

CONCLUSION

Long-term FU of this unique series has confirmed that eOPBCS is a safe procedure for patients with bulky tumours normally treated by mastectomy, without risking local control. TM patients experienced more early complications but LDm patients required more revisions over a more prolonged period of FU.

摘要

目的

极限肿瘤整形保乳术(eOPBCS)允许对肿瘤≥50mm 的患者进行保乳治疗,但长期结果尚不清楚。我们研究了 eOPBCS 后的早期并发症和更长时间的临床和肿瘤学结果,以评估该技术的临床实用性和安全性。

材料和方法

使用 LD 迷你皮瓣(LDm)和治疗性乳房成形术(TM),对 1993 年至 2016 年期间所有 eOPBCS 手术(n=90)进行前瞻性收集,并与医院记录进行交叉核对,以确定随访时间(FU)、临床结果(并发症、修复)、局部复发(LR)和生存率。

结果

共确定了 90 例大型肿瘤(平均直径 67[50-177]mm)的 eOPBCS 手术,总随访时间为 80(10-308)个月(LDm 为 91[13-308]个月,TM 为 54[10-120]个月)。42%的患者淋巴结阳性,2 例为良性(良性病例排除在 LR 和 FU 分析之外)。11 例患者因切除边缘受累而需要再次手术(LDm 为 3 例再次切除术和 2 例乳房切除术,TM 为 6 例乳房切除术)。LDm 患者中有 6%需要手术治疗并发症,37%需要手术治疗修复,TM 患者中有 18%需要手术治疗并发症,7%需要手术治疗修复。7 例患者发生 LR(LDm 为 5 例,TM 为 2 例),预测 5 年和 10 年 LR 率分别为 1.1%和 16%。

结论

对这一独特系列的长期随访证实,eOPBCS 是一种治疗大肿瘤患者的安全手术方法,通常采用乳房切除术,不会影响局部控制。TM 患者早期并发症较多,但 LDm 患者在更长的 FU 期间需要更多的修复。

相似文献

1
Extreme oncoplastic conservation is a safe new alternative to mastectomy.极端肿瘤整形保乳术是一种安全的新选择,可以替代乳房切除术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Breast Conservation Project: Clinical Outcomes of Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Large and Multiple Lesions.保乳项目:极量肿瘤整形保乳术与乳房切除术治疗大肿瘤及多发病灶的临床结局对比。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7582-7593. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15799-4. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.针对较大肿瘤的肿瘤整形保乳手术的短期安全性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.极限肿瘤整形术:为需要乳房切除术的患者保留乳房。
Breast J. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12356. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
5
Early Postoperative Complications after Oncoplastic Reduction.肿瘤整形复位术后的早期并发症
South Med J. 2017 Oct;110(10):660-666. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000706.
6
Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy.与广泛局部切除和乳房切除术相比,肿瘤整形保乳手术在肿瘤学上是安全的。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer.保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌的肿瘤学优势。
Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12047.
8
Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.乳房肿瘤整形与重建外科。
Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.019.
9
Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study.肿瘤整形乳房手术与传统保乳手术的比较性回顾研究
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1236-1241. doi: 10.1111/ans.15245. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.肿瘤整形性乳房缩小术:手术结果的系统评价与比例Meta分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Feb;89:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.052. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
National Survey on Attitudes of Brazilian Breast Surgeons Regarding Oncoplastic Surgery: Success of a Training Model.巴西乳腺外科医生对肿瘤整形手术态度的全国性调查:一种培训模式的成效
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17435-1.
2
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy: ANTHEM multicentre prospective cohort study.接受肿瘤整形保乳手术替代乳房切除术的女性的临床及患者报告结局:ANTHEM多中心前瞻性队列研究
Br J Surg. 2024 Dec 24;112(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae306.
3
Chest wall perforator flaps are safe and can decrease mastectomy rates in breast cancer surgery: multicentre cohort study.
胸壁穿支皮瓣安全,可降低乳腺癌手术中的乳房切除术率:多中心队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 30;111(11). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae266.
4
ASO Author Reflections: Cost Comparison of Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Reconstruction.ASO作者反思:极端肿瘤整形保乳手术与乳房切除术后重建的成本比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7471. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15973-8. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Breast Conservation Project: Clinical Outcomes of Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Large and Multiple Lesions.保乳项目:极量肿瘤整形保乳术与乳房切除术治疗大肿瘤及多发病灶的临床结局对比。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7582-7593. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15799-4. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Comparing Costs: Does Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Confer a Cost Benefit When Compared with Mastectomy and Reconstruction?比较成本:与乳房切除术和重建相比,极端肿瘤整形保乳手术是否具有成本效益?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7463-7470. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15711-0. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
7
Laparoscopically harvested omental flap for immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective single-center study of 300 cases.腹腔镜下采集大网膜瓣即刻乳房重建:300 例回顾性单中心研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr 16;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03377-7.
8
Oncoplastic breast surgery in Europe.欧洲的肿瘤整形乳房手术。
Gland Surg. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):248-256. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-380. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Extreme oncoplasty: past, present and future.极限肿瘤整形术:过去、现在与未来。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 30;13:1215284. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1215284. eCollection 2023.
10
Pushing the Limits of Breast-Conserving Surgery with Extreme Oncoplasty.运用极致整形保乳手术突破保乳手术的极限
Breast Care (Basel). 2023 Oct;18(5):366-373. doi: 10.1159/000531533. Epub 2023 Jun 14.