Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany; Klaipeda University, Marine Research Institute, Herkus Mantas str. 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Dec;149:110544. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110544. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Often, beach litter monitoring strategies focus only on macro-litter (>25 mm) and do not distinguish between litter left at beaches and litter washed up onshore. We tested inexpensive and user-friendly methods to examine meso-litter (5-25 mm) and large micro-litter (2-5 mm) washed up on German sandy beaches and evaluated our methods regarding the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. With a sieve accumulation zone monitoring method, tested 41 times, we found 0.2-21.2 litter pieces/m (⌀ 5.3 pieces/m ± 8.9). With a bare eye accumulation zone monitoring method, tested 10 times, at other beaches, 9.1-65.6 litter pieces/m (⌀ 31.8 pieces/m ± 15.7) were found. Both methods are inexpensive, useful for volunteers, and can be carried out quickly, but are also limited, as they cannot be used regularly. A tested webcam and a modified Braun-Blanquet method turned out to be less suitable.
通常,海滩垃圾监测策略仅关注于大型垃圾(>25mm),而不区分留在海滩上的垃圾和被冲上岸的垃圾。我们测试了一些廉价且易于使用的方法来检测德国沙滩上被冲上的中型垃圾(5-25mm)和大型微垃圾(2-5mm),并根据《海洋战略框架指令》的要求评估了我们的方法。使用筛子积累区监测方法,共测试了 41 次,我们发现每平方米有 0.2-21.2 件垃圾(平均 5.3 件/m ⁇ ±8.9)。使用裸眼积累区监测方法,在其他海滩上共测试了 10 次,发现每平方米有 9.1-65.6 件垃圾(平均 31.8 件/m ⁇ ±15.7)。这两种方法都很便宜,对志愿者有用,并且可以快速进行,但也有局限性,因为它们不能定期使用。经过测试的网络摄像头和修改后的 Braun-Blanquet 方法不太适用。