• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过传统的7厘米抬头和使用充气枕头使外耳道 - 胸骨切迹线水平对齐所达到的两种喉镜检查位置下喉镜视野和插管条件的比较评估——一项前瞻性随机交叉试验。

Comparative evaluation of laryngeal view and intubating conditions in two laryngoscopy positions-attained by conventional 7 cm head raise and that attained by horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus - sternal notch line - using an inflatable pillow - A prospective randomised cross-over trial.

作者信息

Pachisia Anant V, Sharma Kavita R, Dali Jaspal S, Arya Mona, Pangasa Neha, Kumar Rakesh

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):312-317. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_19.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_19
PMID:31543577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6747989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We compared the laryngoscopy position attained by a 7-cm-high pillow (Sniffing position-SP) with that attained by horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus-sternal notch (AM-S) line-using variable height inflatable pillow.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective-randomised-cross-over study included 50 patients in each group. Group-AM-S: A 7 cm uncompressible pillow was used for attaining first laryngoscopy position, followed by horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus-sternal notch (AM-S) line-using an inflatable pillow for attaining second laryngoscopy position followed by intubation. Group-SP: Horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus-sternal notch (AM-S) line-was done using an inflatable pillow for attaining first laryngoscopy position, followed by using 7 cm uncompressible pillow for second laryngoscopy position followed by intubation. The CL-grade, Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) and time to intubation were compared in both positions. The head raise (in cm) required for attaining AM-S alignment was noted.

RESULTS

CL-grade-I was obtained in significantly larger number of patients with AM-S alignment position than with 7 cm head raise ( = 0.004). CL-grade-III was obtained in significantly lesser number of patients with AM-S alignment ( = 0.002). Mean IDS with AM-S alignment (1.18 ± 1.69) was significantly less than with 7cm head raise (2 ± 1.59; = 0.007) and time to intubation with AM-S alignment (17.33 ± 4.52 s) was significantly less than that with 7cm head raise (18.94 ± 4.64 s; = 0.041). The mean head rise required to achieve AM-S line alignment was 4.920 ± 1.460 cm.

CONCLUSION

External Auditory Meatus-Sternal notch (AM-S) line alignment provides better laryngeal view, better intubating conditions and requires lesser time to intubate as compared to a conventional 7-cm-head raise. The size of pillow used for head raise should be individualised.

摘要

背景与目的

我们比较了使用7厘米高的枕头(嗅物位-SP)和使用可充气可变高度枕头使外耳道-胸骨切迹(AM-S)线水平对齐所达到的喉镜检查位置。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性随机交叉研究每组纳入50例患者。AM-S组:使用一个7厘米不可压缩的枕头获得第一个喉镜检查位置,然后使用可充气枕头使外耳道-胸骨切迹(AM-S)线水平对齐以获得第二个喉镜检查位置,随后进行插管。SP组:使用可充气枕头使外耳道-胸骨切迹(AM-S)线水平对齐以获得第一个喉镜检查位置,然后使用7厘米不可压缩的枕头获得第二个喉镜检查位置,随后进行插管。比较两个位置的CL分级、插管难度评分(IDS)和插管时间。记录实现AM-S对齐所需抬高头部的高度(厘米)。

结果

与抬高7厘米头部相比,AM-S对齐位置获得CL-I级的患者数量显著更多(P = 0.004)。AM-S对齐获得CL-III级的患者数量显著更少(P = 0.002)。AM-S对齐时的平均IDS(1.18±1.69)显著低于抬高7厘米头部时(2±1.59;P = 0.007),且AM-S对齐时的插管时间(17.33±4.52秒)显著少于抬高7厘米头部时(18.94±4.64秒;P = 0.041)。实现AM-S线对齐所需的平均头部抬高为4.920±1.460厘米。

结论

与传统的抬高7厘米头部相比,外耳道-胸骨切迹(AM-S)线对齐可提供更好的喉镜视野、更好的插管条件,且插管时间更短。用于抬高头部的枕头尺寸应个体化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/7b58e9cdc881/JOACP-35-312-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/ae16898c00c7/JOACP-35-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/dd8de0847e7b/JOACP-35-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/625f10224f12/JOACP-35-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/4cd81a46d016/JOACP-35-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/56cd3779808c/JOACP-35-312-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/7b58e9cdc881/JOACP-35-312-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/ae16898c00c7/JOACP-35-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/dd8de0847e7b/JOACP-35-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/625f10224f12/JOACP-35-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/4cd81a46d016/JOACP-35-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/56cd3779808c/JOACP-35-312-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7f/6747989/7b58e9cdc881/JOACP-35-312-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of laryngeal view and intubating conditions in two laryngoscopy positions-attained by conventional 7 cm head raise and that attained by horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus - sternal notch line - using an inflatable pillow - A prospective randomised cross-over trial.通过传统的7厘米抬头和使用充气枕头使外耳道 - 胸骨切迹线水平对齐所达到的两种喉镜检查位置下喉镜视野和插管条件的比较评估——一项前瞻性随机交叉试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):312-317. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_19.
2
A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy.一项关于在嗅物位使用麦金托什喉镜进行气管插管时定制型与固定尺寸枕头的随机对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 May;62(5):344-349. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_672_17.
3
Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study.头高位对使用 McGrath MAC 视频喉镜行气管插管的影响:一项模拟困难气道的前瞻性随机交叉研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 30;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01706-5.
4
Evaluation of Glottic View and Intubation Conditions with Sniffing Position Using Three Different Pillow Heights during Direct Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Analytical Study.直接喉镜检查时使用三种不同枕头高度的嗅物位评估声门视野和插管条件:一项前瞻性分析研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):412-415. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_130_22. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Simple method for obtaining the optimal laryngoscopic view in children: A prospective observational study.在儿童中获得最佳喉镜视野的简单方法:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;35(6):867-870. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.048. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
6
Comparison of Laryngoscopic View Obtained by Conventional Head Rise to that Obtained by Horizontal Alignment of External Auditory Meatus and Sternal Notch.传统抬头位与外耳道和胸骨切迹水平对齐位喉镜视野的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):535-538. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_40_19.
7
A Randomized Study Comparing the Sniffing Position with Simple Head Extension for Glottis Visualization and Difficulty in Intubation during Direct Laryngoscopy.一项比较嗅物位与单纯头部后仰在直接喉镜检查时声门可视化及插管难度的随机研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):762-766. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.204206.
8
Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions.喉镜检查与病态肥胖:“嗅物位”和“斜坡位”的比较
Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
9
Modified-ramped position: a new position for intubation of obese females: a randomized controlled pilot study.改良斜坡位:肥胖女性插管的新体位:一项随机对照初步研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01070-2.
10
Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated position in obese patients: a randomized, controlled, equivalence trial.肥胖患者头高位喉镜检查和气管插管:一项随机对照等效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1912-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818556ed.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of intubating conditions in supine (sniffing) and 25° back-up position using channelled and non-channelled video laryngoscopes - A randomised controlled study.使用带通道和不带通道的视频喉镜比较仰卧位(嗅物位)和背部抬高25°体位下的插管条件——一项随机对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;67(12):1090-1095. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_662_23. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
A comparative evaluation of the sniffing, the simple head extension and the head hyperextension positions for laryngoscopic view and intubation difficulty in adults undergoing direct laryngoscopy.成人直接喉镜检查中嗅探、单纯头伸展和头过度伸展体位对喉镜视野和插管难度的比较评估。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1401-1407. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08386-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic optimisation of the sniff position during laryngoscopy using a pressure infusion bag.使用压力输注袋在喉镜检查期间动态优化嗅物位
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):677-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07170.x.
2
Comparative evaluation of the sniffing position with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view and intubation difficulty in adults undergoing elective surgery.在接受择期手术的成年患者中,比较嗅物位与简单头部伸展对喉镜视野和插管难度的影响。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:297913. doi: 10.1155/2011/297913. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
3
Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy.
Evaluation of Glottic View and Intubation Conditions with Sniffing Position Using Three Different Pillow Heights during Direct Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Analytical Study.直接喉镜检查时使用三种不同枕头高度的嗅物位评估声门视野和插管条件:一项前瞻性分析研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):412-415. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_130_22. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study.头高位对使用 McGrath MAC 视频喉镜行气管插管的影响:一项模拟困难气道的前瞻性随机交叉研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 30;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01706-5.
5
To sniff or not to sniff: The eternal debate.闻还是不闻:永恒的辩论。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan-Mar;36(1):100-101. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_181_19. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Optimal position for laryngoscopy - Time for individualization?喉镜检查的最佳位置——是时候个体化了吗?
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):289-291. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_254_19.
直接喉镜检查时的头颈部位置。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):103-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821c7e9c. Epub 2011 May 19.
4
A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.根据枕头高度比较直接喉镜视图。
J Anesth. 2010 Aug;24(4):526-30. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0962-x. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
5
External auditory meatus-sternal notch relationship in adults in the sniffing position: a magnetic resonance imaging study.成人嗅位时外耳道-胸骨切迹关系的磁共振成像研究
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):268-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep390.
6
Head and neck elevation beyond the sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy.在困难直接喉镜检查的情况下,将头颈部抬高至嗅物位以上可改善喉镜视野。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):335-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00368-9.
7
Randomized study comparing the "sniffing position" with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients.在择期手术患者中比较“嗅物位”与单纯头部后仰对喉镜视野影响的随机研究。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Oct;95(4):836-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200110000-00009.
8
Study of the "sniffing position" by magnetic resonance imaging.通过磁共振成像对“嗅吸位”的研究。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Jan;94(1):83-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200101000-00017.
9
The three axis alignment theory and the "sniffing position": perpetuation of an anatomic myth?三轴对齐理论与“嗅物位”:一种解剖学谬误的延续?
Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1964-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00060.
10
Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy.一种改良的直接喉镜检查分级评分系统的评估
Anaesthesia. 1998 Nov;53(11):1041-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00605.x.