• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际胰腺移植登记处报告。

International Pancreas Transplant Registry report.

作者信息

Sutherland D E, Moudry-Munns K C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 1988:53-64.

PMID:3154495
Abstract

From December 1966 to December 1988, 1,830 pancreas transplants were reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Of these, 1,549 were reported as of June 30, 1988 and analyzed on July 13, 1988. One-year actuarial graft function (insulin-independent) and recipient survival rates for all cases were 42% and 80%, respectively. In an analysis by era of 1966 to 1977 (n = 64), 1978 to 1983 (n = 336), 1984 to 1985 (n = 387), and 1986 to 1988 (n = 762) cases, 1-year graft function rates were 5%, 25%, 41%, and 55% and recipient survival rates were 44%, 72%, 81%, and 88%, respectively (p less than or equal to 0.01 all comparisons). In an analysis of 1984 to 1988 cases only (n = 1,149), the overall 1-year graft function and patient survival rates were 49% and 85%, respectively. During this period, graft functional survival rates for the most common duct management methods were 53% for duct injection (n = 313), 45% for intestinal drainage (n = 257), and 51% for bladder drainage (n = 535) at 1 year (p less than 0.04 for intestinal vs bladder drainage). Graft function rates were similar for whole (n = 552) and segmental (n = 595) pancreas transplants (48% vs 50% at 1 year). Functional survival rates according to duration of preservation for grafts stored less than 6 hours (n = 706), 6-12 hours (n = 243), 12-24 hours (n = 95), and 12-24 hours (n = 9) were 50%, 47%, 43%, and 78% at 1 year, and none of the differences were significant. Graft functional survival rates for 1984 to 1988 cases were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in recipients who received AZA and CsA in combination (n = 895) than in those who received CsA without AZA (n = 218) or AZA without CsA, (n = 27), with 1-year graft functional survival rates of 52%, 41%, and 33%, respectively. For technically successful grafts, the function survival rates were also significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in recipients treated with CsA + AZA (n = 708) than in those who received CsA without AZA (n = 156) or AZA without CsA (n = 19), with 1-year function rates of 66%, 56%, and 47%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

1966年12月至1988年12月期间,国际胰腺移植登记处共收到1830例胰腺移植报告。其中,截至1988年6月30日报告了1549例,并于1988年7月13日进行了分析。所有病例的1年精算移植功能(不依赖胰岛素)和受者生存率分别为42%和80%。在按时间段分析时,1966年至1977年(n = 64)、1978年至1983年(n = 336)、1984年至1985年(n = 387)以及1986年至1988年(n = 762)的病例中,1年移植功能率分别为5%、25%、41%和55%,受者生存率分别为44%、72%、81%和88%(所有比较p均≤0.01)。仅分析1984年至1988年的病例(n = 1149)时,总体1年移植功能和患者生存率分别为49%和85%。在此期间,1年时最常见的导管处理方法的移植功能生存率为:导管注射(n = 313)为53%,肠道引流(n = 257)为45%,膀胱引流(n = 535)为51%(肠道引流与膀胱引流比较p<0.04)。全胰腺移植(n = 552)和节段性胰腺移植(n = 595)的移植功能率相似(1年时分别为48%对50%)。对于保存时间小于6小时(n = 706)、6 - 12小时(n = 243)、12 - 24小时(n = 95)以及24小时以上(n = 9)的移植物,1年时的功能生存率分别为50%、47%、43%和78%,差异均无统计学意义。1984年至1988年病例中,联合使用硫唑嘌呤(AZA)和环孢素(CsA)的受者(n = 895)的移植功能生存率显著高于单独使用CsA(n = 218)或单独使用AZA(n = 27)的受者,1年移植功能生存率分别为52%、41%和33%(p<0.05)。对于技术成功的移植物,接受CsA + AZA治疗的受者(n = 708)的功能生存率也显著高于单独使用CsA(n = 156)或单独使用AZA(n = 19)的受者,1年功能率分别为66%、56%和47%(p<0.05)。(摘要截断于400字)

相似文献

1
International Pancreas Transplant Registry report.国际胰腺移植登记处报告。
Clin Transpl. 1988:53-64.
2
Pancreas Transplant Registry: history and analysis of cases 1966 to October 1986.胰腺移植登记处:1966年至1986年10月病例的历史与分析
Pancreas. 1987;2(4):473-88.
3
Pancreas transplantation in the United States as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and analyzed by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告并经国际胰腺移植登记处分析的美国胰腺移植情况。
Clin Transpl. 1995:49-67.
4
Pancreas transplantation in the United States (US) and non-US as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及其他国家的胰腺移植情况。
Clin Transpl. 1996:47-67.
5
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October 2002.截至2002年10月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transpl. 2002:41-77.
6
Pancreas transplant results in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Registry compared with non-USA data in the International Registry.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处中胰腺移植的结果与国际登记处的非美国数据相比较。
Clin Transpl. 1994:47-68.
7
Analysis of United States (US) and non-US pancreas transplants as reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) and to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).向国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)和器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告的美国及非美国胰腺移植情况分析。
Clin Transpl. 1998:53-73.
8
Analysis of United States (US) and non-US pancreas transplants reported to the United network for organ sharing (UNOS) and the international pancreas transplant registry (IPTR) as of October 2001.截至2001年10月,对向美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国胰腺移植情况进行分析。
Clin Transpl. 2001:41-72.
9
Pancreas transplantation: report from the International Registry and a preliminary analysis of United States results from the New United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry.
Clin Transpl. 1989:19-43.
10
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of May 2003.截至2003年5月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transpl. 2003:21-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Donor hyperglycemia as a minor risk factor and immunologic variables as major risk factors for pancreas allograft loss in a multivariate analysis of a single institution's experience.在对单一机构经验的多变量分析中,供体高血糖作为次要风险因素,而免疫变量作为胰腺同种异体移植丢失的主要风险因素。
Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):217-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00005.