LeVay S, Voigt T
Robert Bosch Vision Research Center, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA 92138.
Vis Neurosci. 1988;1(4):395-414. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800004168.
The orientation selectivity, ocular dominance, and binocular disparity tuning of 272 cells in areas 17 and 18 of barbiturate-anesthetized, paralyzed cats were studied with automated, quantitative techniques. Disparity was varied along the axis orthogonal to each cell's best orientation. Binocular correspondence was established by means of a reference electrode positioned at the boundary of lamina A and A1 in the area centralis representation of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Measures were derived that expressed each cell's disparity sensitivity and best disparity and the shape and slope of its tuning curve. Cells were found that corresponded to categories described by previous authors ("disparity-insensitive," "tuned excitatory," "near," and "far" cells), but many others had intermediate response patterns, or patterns that were difficult to categorize. Quantitative analysis suggested that the various types belong to a continuum. No relationship could be established between a cell's best orientation and its ocular dominance or any aspect of its disparity tuning. There was no relationship between a cell's ocular dominance and its sensitivity to disparity. Ocular dominance and best disparity were related. As reported by others, cells with best disparities close to zero (the fixation plane) tended to have balanced ocularity, while cells with best disparities in the near or far range had a broad distribution of ocular dominance. Among cells with receptive fields near the vertical meridian, those preferring far disparities tended to be dominated by the contralateral eye, and those preferring near disparities by the ipsilateral eye. It is suggested that this relationship follows from the geometry of near and far images and the pattern of decussation in the visual pathway. There was a significant grouping of cells with similar best disparities along tangential electrode tracks. We believe that this grouping is due to the columnar organization for ocular dominance and the relationship between ocular dominance and best disparity. No evidence was found for a columnar segregation of disparity-sensitive and disparity-insensitive cells.
采用自动化定量技术,研究了巴比妥麻醉、麻痹的猫的17区和18区中272个细胞的方向选择性、眼优势和双眼视差调谐。视差沿与每个细胞最佳方向正交的轴变化。通过位于外侧膝状体中央区代表区A层和A1层边界的参考电极建立双眼对应关系。得出了表示每个细胞视差敏感性、最佳视差及其调谐曲线形状和斜率的测量值。发现了与先前作者描述的类别相对应的细胞(“视差不敏感”、“调谐兴奋”、“近”和“远”细胞),但许多其他细胞具有中间反应模式或难以分类的模式。定量分析表明,各种类型属于一个连续体。细胞的最佳方向与其眼优势或其视差调谐的任何方面之间没有关系。细胞的眼优势与其对视差的敏感性之间没有关系。眼优势和最佳视差是相关的。正如其他人所报道的,最佳视差接近零(注视平面)的细胞往往具有平衡的眼性,而最佳视差在近或远范围内的细胞具有广泛的眼优势分布。在感受野靠近垂直子午线的细胞中,偏好远视差的细胞往往由对侧眼主导,而偏好近视差的细胞由同侧眼主导。有人认为,这种关系源于近像和远像的几何形状以及视觉通路中的交叉模式。沿切线电极轨迹有具有相似最佳视差的细胞的显著分组。我们认为这种分组是由于眼优势的柱状组织以及眼优势和最佳视差之间的关系。没有发现视差敏感和视差不敏感细胞柱状分离的证据。