• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生认为实现结直肠癌手术最佳医院绩效的最重要因素:荷兰改良德尔菲法

Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method.

作者信息

van Groningen Julia Tessa, Marang-van de Mheen Perla J, Henneman Daniel, Beets Geerard L, Wouters Michel W J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e025304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025304.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025304
PMID:31551369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hospital variation in risk-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery has been shown. However, explanatory factors are not sufficiently clear. The objective of this study was to identify factors perceived by gastrointestinal surgeons as important to achieve excellent casemix-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

Based on literature and experts' opinion, 86 factors associated with serious complications, failure to rescue and mortality were listed. These were presented to gastrointestinal surgeons through two web-based surveys and an expert meeting. Participants were asked to choose their top 10 of most important factors.

PARTICIPANTS

Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons (n=52) of different hospitals and different hospital types (general/teaching/academic).

RESULTS

Of 31 invited experts for the first survey and meeting, 71% responded. Of 130 invited surgeons, 34 responded to the second survey. Factors deemed important were: procedural hospital volume (46% in top 10), specialised surgeons performing surgery, (elective 87%, emergency 60% and reoperations 62% in top 10), accessibility of, and daily ward rounds by specialised surgeons (41% and 38% in top 10), preoperative screening for malnutrition (57% in top 10), a protocol for recognition of anastomotic leakage and rapid reintervention (54% and 49% in top 10).

CONCLUSION

Procedural hospital volume, specialisation of surgeons, screening for malnutrition, early recognition of complications followed by rapid action were perceived as most important factors to achieve good outcomes by gastrointestinal surgeons.

摘要

目的

已表明结直肠癌手术后风险调整结局存在医院差异。然而,解释性因素尚不够明确。本研究的目的是确定胃肠外科医生认为对结直肠癌手术后实现出色的病例组合调整结局至关重要的因素。

设计

基于文献和专家意见,列出了86个与严重并发症、未能挽救及死亡率相关的因素。通过两项基于网络的调查和一次专家会议将这些因素呈现给胃肠外科医生。要求参与者选出最重要的10个因素。

参与者

来自不同医院及不同医院类型(综合/教学/学术)的荷兰胃肠外科医生(n = 52)。

结果

在首次调查和会议邀请的31位专家中,71%做出了回应。在130位受邀外科医生中,34位对第二次调查做出了回应。被认为重要的因素包括:手术医院量(在前十中占46%)、进行手术的专科医生(择期手术在前十中占87%,急诊手术占60%,再次手术占62%)、专科医生的可及性及每日查房(在前十中分别占41%和38%)、术前营养不良筛查(在前十中占57%)、吻合口漏识别及快速再次干预方案(在前十中分别占54%和49%)。

结论

手术医院量、外科医生专业化、营养不良筛查、并发症的早期识别及随后的快速行动被胃肠外科医生视为实现良好结局的最重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b537/6773321/60e13ddb7cf6/bmjopen-2018-025304f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b537/6773321/60e13ddb7cf6/bmjopen-2018-025304f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b537/6773321/60e13ddb7cf6/bmjopen-2018-025304f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method.外科医生认为实现结直肠癌手术最佳医院绩效的最重要因素:荷兰改良德尔菲法
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e025304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025304.
2
Patient blood management in colorectal cancer patients: a survey among Dutch gastroenterologists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists.结直肠癌患者的患者血液管理:荷兰胃肠病学家、外科医生和麻醉师的一项调查。
Transfusion. 2018 Oct;58(10):2345-2351. doi: 10.1111/trf.14807. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Major differences in follow-up practice of patients with colorectal cancer; results of a national survey in the Netherlands.结直肠癌患者随访实践的主要差异;荷兰全国调查结果。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6509-0.
4
Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice.一项针对荷兰治疗结直肠癌患者的外科医生的全国性调查结果。关于随访、转移灶治疗以及修订随访实践的原因的当前观点。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):787-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01303.x. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
5
Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients: A statewide analysis of surgeon and hospital volume with outcomes.老年患者的急诊普通外科:基于手术医生和医院容量与结局的全州分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6):864-875. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001829.
6
Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: comparative views of colorectal and liver surgeons.结直肠癌和肝转移的同步切除:结直肠外科医生和肝脏外科医生的对比观点。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):e477-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02992.x.
7
Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术后的工作量及外科医生专业与手术结果的关系
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3.
8
Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术中的容量和结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;36 Suppl 1:S55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.027. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
9
Variations in colorectal cancer surgery practice across the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic - 'Every land has its own law'.英国在 COVID-19 大流行期间结直肠癌手术实践的差异 - “各地有各地的法律”。
Surgeon. 2021 Oct;19(5):e183-e192. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit data.一种评估结直肠癌手术医院质量的手术量与结局的综合指标,临床审计数据的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088737. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons' preference on rectal cancer treatment.国际大学结肠和直肠外科医生协会关于外科医生对直肠癌治疗偏好的调查。
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Aug;39(4):307-314. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
2
Funnel plots of patient-reported outcomes to evaluate health-care quality: Basic principles, pitfalls and considerations.漏斗图评估医疗保健质量的患者报告结局:基本原则、陷阱和注意事项。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Feb;26(2):95-104. doi: 10.1111/nep.13761. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.2000 年以来直肠癌患者接受治疗的情况下,医院和外科医生手术量与直肠癌手术结果之间的关联:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Nov;61(11):1320-1332. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001198.
2
Hospital Teaching Status and Patients' Outcomes After Colon Cancer Surgery.结肠癌手术后的医院教学状况与患者预后
World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3372-3380. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4580-3.
3
The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
医院规模对直肠癌手术后长期肿瘤学结局的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
4
The impact of hospital volume on perioperative outcomes of rectal cancer.医院规模对直肠癌围手术期结局的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;43(10):1894-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
5
Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术中医院及外科医生手术量与治疗结果关系的系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun;8(3):534-546. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.25.
6
Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中的结直肠特异性与生存情况
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;18(2):O51-60. doi: 10.1111/codi.13246.
7
Importance of teamwork, communication and culture on failure-to-rescue in the elderly.团队合作、沟通及文化对老年人抢救失败的重要性。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(2):e47-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10031. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Influence of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes Following Appendicectomy in Children.关于外科医生专业化对儿童阑尾切除术后结局影响的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(32):e1352. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001352.
9
Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery by Sequential Implementation of Multiple Standardized Care Programs.通过序贯实施多个标准化护理方案改善结直肠外科手术的结局。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):404-14.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.一项系统性综述,旨在确定影响手术中抢救失败及护理升级的因素。
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):752-63. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.017.