Center for Studies of Psychological Application and School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 24;9(1):13727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49990-5.
An object's location can be represented either relative to an observer's body effectors (egocentric reference frame) or relative to another external object (allocentric reference frame). In non-spatial tasks, an object's task-irrelevant egocentric position conflicts with the side of a task-relevant manual response, which defines the classical Simon effect. Growing evidence suggests that the Simon effect occurs not only based on conflicting positions within the egocentric but also within the allocentric reference frame. Although neural mechanisms underlying the egocentric Simon effect have been extensively researched, neural mechanisms underlying the allocentric Simon effect and their potential interaction with those underlying its egocentric variant remain to be explored. In this fMRI study, spatial congruency between the task-irrelevant egocentric and allocentric target positions and the task-relevant response hand was orthogonally manipulated. Behaviorally, a significant Simon effect was observed for both reference frames. Neurally, three sub-regions in the frontoparietal network were involved in different aspects of the Simon effect, depending on the source of the task-irrelevant object locations. The right precentral gyrus, extending to the right SMA, was generally activated by Simon conflicts, irrespective of the spatial reference frame involved, and showed no additive activity to Simon conflicts. In contrast, the right postcentral gyrus was specifically involved in Simon conflicts induced by task-irrelevant allocentric, rather than egocentric, representations. Furthermore, a right lateral frontoparietal network showed increased neural activity whenever the egocentric and allocentric target locations were incongruent, indicating its functional role as a mismatch detector that monitors the discrepancy concerning allocentric and egocentric object locations.
物体的位置可以通过相对于观察者的身体效应器(自我参照框架)或相对于另一个外部物体(非自我参照框架)来表示。在非空间任务中,物体的与任务无关的自我参照位置与任务相关的手动反应的一侧冲突,这定义了经典的西蒙效应。越来越多的证据表明,西蒙效应不仅基于自我参照框架内的冲突位置,而且还基于非自我参照框架内的冲突位置。尽管已经广泛研究了自我参照西蒙效应的神经机制,但非自我参照西蒙效应的神经机制及其与自我参照变体的潜在相互作用仍有待探索。在这项 fMRI 研究中,任务无关的自我参照和非自我参照目标位置与任务相关的反应手之间的空间一致性被正交操纵。行为上,两种参照框架都观察到了显著的西蒙效应。在神经上,三个额顶网络的子区域参与了西蒙效应的不同方面,具体取决于任务无关物体位置的来源。右侧中央前回,延伸至右侧 SMA,通常被西蒙冲突激活,而与所涉及的空间参照框架无关,并且对西蒙冲突没有附加活动。相比之下,右侧中央后回专门参与由任务无关的非自我参照而非自我参照表示引起的西蒙冲突。此外,当自我参照和非自我参照目标位置不一致时,右侧额顶外侧网络显示出增加的神经活动,表明其作为失配探测器的功能作用,用于监测有关非自我参照和自我参照物体位置的差异。