Ceceli Ahmet O, Esposito Giavanna, Tricomi Elizabeth
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, United States.
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01997. eCollection 2019.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with neurobehavioral reward system dysfunctions that pose debilitating impairments in adaptive decision-making. A candidate mechanism for such anomalies in ADHD may be a compromise in the control of motivated behaviors. Thus, demonstrating and restoring potential motivational control irregularities may serve significant clinical benefit. The motivational control of action guides goal-directed behaviors that are driven by outcome value, and habits that are inflexibly cue-triggered. We examined whether ADHD symptomology within the general population is linked to habitual control, and whether a motivation-based manipulation can break well-learned habits. We obtained symptom severity scores from 106 participants and administered a Go/NoGo task that capitalizes on familiar, well-learned associations (green-Go and red-NoGo) to demonstrate outcome-insensitivity when compared to newly learned Go/NoGo associations. We tested for outcome-insensitive habits by changing the Go and NoGo contingencies, such that Go signals became NoGo signals and vice versa. We found that generally, participants responded less accurately when green and red stimuli were mapped to color-response contingencies that were incongruent with daily experiences, whereas novel Go/NoGo stimuli evoked similar accuracy regardless of color-response mappings. Thus, our Go/NoGo task successfully elicited outcome-insensitive habits (i.e., persistent responses to familiar stimuli without regard for consequences); however, this effect was independent of ADHD symptomology. Nevertheless, we found an association between hyperactivity and congruent Go response latency, suggesting heightened pre-potency to perform habitual Go actions as hyperactivity increases. To examine habit disruption, participants returned to the lab and underwent the familiar version of the Go/NoGo task, but were given mid-experiment performance tracking information and a monetary incentive prior to contingency change. We found that this motivational boost via dual feedback prevented the incongruency-related accuracy impairment, effectively breaking the habit, albeit independent of ADHD symptomology. Our findings present only a modest link between ADHD symptomology and motivational control, which may be due to compensatory mechanisms in ADHD driving goal-directed control, or our task's potential insensitivity to individual differences in ADHD symptomology. Further investigations may be crucial for determining whether ADHD is related to motivational impairments.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与神经行为奖励系统功能障碍有关,这些功能障碍在适应性决策中造成了使人衰弱的损害。ADHD中此类异常的一个候选机制可能是动机行为控制方面的缺陷。因此,证明并恢复潜在的动机控制异常可能具有重大的临床益处。行动的动机控制指导由结果价值驱动的目标导向行为以及由线索灵活触发的习惯。我们研究了一般人群中的ADHD症状是否与习惯性控制有关,以及基于动机的操作是否可以打破已熟练掌握的习惯。我们从106名参与者那里获得了症状严重程度评分,并进行了一项Go/NoGo任务,该任务利用熟悉的、已熟练掌握的关联(绿色 - Go和红色 - NoGo)来证明与新学习的Go/NoGo关联相比对结果不敏感。我们通过改变Go和NoGo的条件来测试对结果不敏感的习惯,使得Go信号变成NoGo信号,反之亦然。我们发现,一般来说,当绿色和红色刺激被映射到与日常经验不一致的颜色 - 反应条件时,参与者的反应准确性较低,而新颖的Go/NoGo刺激无论颜色 - 反应映射如何都能唤起相似的准确性。因此,我们的Go/NoGo任务成功地引发了对结果不敏感的习惯(即对熟悉刺激的持续反应而不考虑后果);然而,这种效应与ADHD症状无关。尽管如此,我们发现多动与一致的Go反应潜伏期之间存在关联,这表明随着多动增加,执行习惯性Go动作的预先优势增强。为了研究习惯的破坏,参与者回到实验室,接受熟悉版本的Go/NoGo任务,但在条件改变之前给予他们实验中期的表现跟踪信息和金钱奖励。我们发现,通过双重反馈的这种动机增强防止了与不一致相关的准确性损害,有效地打破了习惯,尽管这与ADHD症状无关。我们的研究结果仅表明ADHD症状与动机控制之间存在适度的联系,这可能是由于ADHD中的补偿机制驱动目标导向控制,或者我们的任务对ADHD症状的个体差异可能不敏感。进一步的研究对于确定ADHD是否与动机损害有关可能至关重要。