Toledo-Fernández Aldebarán, Marín-Navarrete Rodrigo, Villalobos-Gallegos Luis, Salvador-Cruz Judith, Benjet Corina, Roncero Carlos
Clinical Trials Unit on Addiction and Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, Mexico.
School of Medicine and Psychology, Autonomous University of Baja California-Tijuana, Tijuana, Mexico.
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2019 Nov;24(6):421-433. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2019.1670631. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
The objectives were to identify a latent factor of cognitive reserve (CR) assessed by self-rating of cognitively stimulating activities, to analyze the association between this factor and educational attainment, and to test whether CR moderates the association between polysubstance use and neurocognitive disorder (NCD). Cross-sectional data of 753 participants was collected in Mexico City. A questionnaire for self-rating of stimulating activities (work/education, leisure, physical, social, usual- and current environments) was designed. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test unifactoriality. This CR factor was then used within a structural equation model of moderation between recent- and years of substance use and indicators of NCD (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and an interview for subjective cognitive deficits). We found acceptable goodness-of-fit values for the unifactorial model, but no association of this factor with educational attainment, nor with recent- and years of substance use (suggesting independence of CR and severity of neuropathology). We did not find a moderation effect of CR between substance use and indicators of NCD; CR was negatively associated with subjective cognitive deficits only. Moderation effect of self-rated CR should be further tested using direct measures of substance-induced neuropathology. Measurement of self-rated CR may complement self-reported cognitive examination.
研究目的是确定通过对认知刺激活动进行自评评估的认知储备(CR)潜在因素,分析该因素与教育程度之间的关联,并检验CR是否调节多物质使用与神经认知障碍(NCD)之间的关联。在墨西哥城收集了753名参与者的横断面数据。设计了一份用于对刺激活动(工作/教育、休闲、体育、社交、日常和当前环境)进行自评的问卷。进行验证性因素分析以检验单因素性。然后,在近期和多年物质使用与NCD指标(蒙特利尔认知评估和主观认知缺陷访谈)之间的调节结构方程模型中使用该CR因素。我们发现单因素模型的拟合优度值可接受,但该因素与教育程度以及近期和多年物质使用均无关联(表明CR与神经病理学严重程度无关)。我们未发现CR在物质使用与NCD指标之间存在调节作用;CR仅与主观认知缺陷呈负相关。应使用物质诱导神经病理学的直接测量方法进一步检验自评CR的调节作用。自评CR的测量可能补充自我报告的认知检查。