• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在比利时,多学科方法在国家管理腰痛和神经根痛的路径的所有阶段和各级都起着关键作用。

The pivotal role for the multidisciplinary approach at all phases and at all levels in the national pathway for the management of low back pain and radicular pain in Belgium.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium -

Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;56(2):228-236. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05984-7. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05984-7
PMID:31556511
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High level evidence on management of spinal disorders is scarce, which results in guidelines being of limited practical use for practitioners. Care pathways are complex interventions intended for the mutual decision making of organization of care processes for a well-defined group of patients. The goal of this project was to design a pathway for the management of low back pain and radicular pain for national implementation in Belgium.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An international and Belgian study on characteristics of low back pain care pathways was performed along with a literature study and focus group interrogation. Based on essential building elements identified and a consensus approach among all relevant stakeholders in primary, hospital and reintegration care, a national pathway was constructed. The process was endorsed by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center, Belgian National Institute of Health and Disability Insurance and the Spine Society of Belgium.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven international pathways were identified, varying in implementation width from hospital-based to region/province-based. Seven Belgian pathway initiatives were detected. Notwithstanding differences, consistent building elements were identified. Three groups of caregivers, divided in primary care, hospital care and reintegration and including all relevant medical/paramedical disciplines, worked on integrating the essential building elements into a single concrete patient pathway of direct use to any caregiver and patient and based on a consensus model including reference to the 2017 Belgian adaptation of the 2016 NICE guidelines. The resulting pathways on management of low back pain and radicular pain underpin the importance of multidisciplinary teamwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Essential building elements were identified from literature and established pathways and were successfully integrated in a Belgian national low back pain and radicular pain pathway using an integrative consensus approach. The pathways are consultable at www.lowbackpain.kce.be.

摘要

简介

关于脊柱疾病管理的高水平证据很少,这导致指南对从业者的实际应用有限。护理途径是复杂的干预措施,旨在为明确界定的患者群体的护理流程组织进行共同决策。该项目的目标是为管理下腰痛和神经根痛设计一条途径,以便在比利时全国实施。

证据获取

对国际和比利时的下腰痛护理途径特征进行了研究,同时进行了文献研究和焦点小组询问。根据确定的基本构建要素以及初级、医院和再融合护理中所有相关利益相关者之间的共识方法,构建了一条国家途径。该过程得到了比利时医疗保健知识中心、比利时国家健康和残疾保险研究所和比利时脊柱学会的认可。

证据综合

确定了 11 条国际途径,实施范围从基于医院到基于区域/省。发现了 7 个比利时途径倡议。尽管存在差异,但仍确定了一致的构建要素。三个护理人员组,分为初级保健、医院护理和再融合,包括所有相关的医学/辅助医学学科,致力于将基本构建要素整合到一个单一的具体患者途径中,该途径可直接用于任何护理人员和患者,并基于共识模型,包括参考 2017 年比利时对 2016 年 NICE 指南的改编。由此产生的下腰痛和神经根痛管理途径强调了多学科团队合作的重要性。

结论

从文献和已建立的途径中确定了基本的构建要素,并使用综合共识方法成功地将其整合到比利时国家下腰痛和神经根痛途径中。这些途径可在 www.lowbackpain.kce.be 查阅。

相似文献

1
The pivotal role for the multidisciplinary approach at all phases and at all levels in the national pathway for the management of low back pain and radicular pain in Belgium.在比利时,多学科方法在国家管理腰痛和神经根痛的路径的所有阶段和各级都起着关键作用。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;56(2):228-236. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05984-7. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
The Belgian national guideline on low back pain and radicular pain: key roles for rehabilitation, assessment of rehabilitation potential and the PRM specialist.比利时下腰痛和神经根痛国家指南:康复的关键作用、康复潜力评估和 PRM 专家。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;56(2):220-227. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05983-5. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
International comparative study of low back pain care pathways and analysis of key interventions.国际下腰痛照护路径比较研究及关键干预措施分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Apr;30(4):1043-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06675-2. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
[Low back and radicular pain : which management in 2018 ?].[下背部和神经根性疼痛:2018年如何治疗?]
Rev Med Liege. 2018 Mar;73(3):114-118.
5
Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.慢性下腰痛手术治疗中的决策:用于选择腰椎融合术患者的预后测试的效能
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013 Feb;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565.
6
Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.临床指南和支付方政策对慢性下腰痛融合治疗的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4.
7
A systematic review of low back pain and sciatica patients' expectations and experiences of health care.对腰痛和坐骨神经痛患者的医疗保健期望与体验的系统评价。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1769-80. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.029. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
Low back and radicular pain: a pathway for care developed by the British Pain Society.腰背及神经根痛:英国疼痛学会制定的护理路径。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):112-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet172.
9
[Critical appraisal of the battery of questionnaires used in the French-speaking Belgian spine rehabilitation centers for low back pain].
Rev Med Liege. 2020 Sep;75(9):582-587.
10
[Low back pain and sciatica].[腰痛与坐骨神经痛]
Nihon Rinsho. 2001 Sep;59(9):1743-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiotherapeutic and non-conventional approaches in patients with chronic low-back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis.慢性下背痛患者的物理治疗和非传统方法:I 级贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62276-9.
2
Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.系统评价指南推荐用于治疗腰痛的药物。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 13;30(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00435-3.
3
Generalization of fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior as predictors of work resumption after back surgery: a study protocol for a prospective study (WABS).
运动相关疼痛恐惧和回避行为的泛化作为背部手术后恢复工作的预测指标:一项前瞻性研究的研究方案(WABS)。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 22;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00736-5.
4
Confluent abscesses in autochthonous back muscles after spinal injections : A case report and narrative review of the literature on low back pain and spinal injections.自发性腰背肌融合性脓肿:一例病例报告及对腰背痛与脊柱注射相关文献的综述
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022 Sep;172(11-12):247-255. doi: 10.1007/s10354-020-00773-y. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients' experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study.为何管理坐骨神经痛很困难:患者对国民保健制度坐骨神经痛途径的体验。一项定性、解释性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e037157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037157.