G-Kracht Mental Health Care Institute.
Institute of Psychology.
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):170-180. doi: 10.1037/per0000361. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Waiting lists for psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders are increasing; there is an imbalance between the number of patients seeking help and the amount of therapy available. Thus, there is a need for time-limited treatments that are effective for specific patients and their specific problems. This pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two 8-week group modules + treatment as usual (TAU): schema mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (SMBCT) and competitive memory therapy (COMET) with special attention to predictors and mediators of change. Patients ( = 58) were randomized to either SMBCT + TAU or COMET + TAU. The dropout rate was 34%. Time effects were found for both treatments, but neither was more effective than the other, and around 23% showed deterioration after treatment. Explorative analyses suggested that predictors for change were severity of psychological distress and a demanding and/or punitive attitude toward oneself at baseline. Global severity index change in the beginning of the treatment mediated schema changes later on in treatment. SMBCT + TAU and COMET + TAU might be mostly suitable for patients with high levels of symptom severity followed by high scores on parent modes. More research is needed to tailor these time-limited therapies to specific personality problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
等待接受人格障碍患者心理治疗的名单在增加;寻求帮助的患者数量和可用治疗方法之间存在不平衡。因此,需要采用针对特定患者及其特定问题的限时有效治疗方法。这项试点随机对照试验旨在调查两种 8 周团体模块+常规治疗(TAU)的有效性:图式正念认知疗法(SMBCT)和竞争记忆疗法(COMET),并特别关注变化的预测因素和中介因素。将患者(=58)随机分配到 SMBCT+TAU 或 COMET+TAU 组。脱落率为 34%。两种治疗方法都发现了时间效应,但都没有比另一种更有效,而且大约 23%的患者在治疗后出现恶化。探索性分析表明,变化的预测因素是心理困扰的严重程度和自我的苛刻/惩罚性态度。治疗开始时的总体严重程度指数变化中介了治疗后期的图式变化。SMBCT+TAU 和 COMET+TAU 可能更适合症状严重程度高、父母模式得分高的患者。需要进一步的研究来针对特定的人格问题定制这些限时治疗方法。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。