• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用香烟购买任务表征烟草的强化价值:一种项目反应理论方法。

Characterizing the reinforcing value of tobacco using a cigarette purchase task: An item response theory approach.

作者信息

González-Roz Alba, Secades-Villa Roberto, Weidberg Sara, Muñiz José, MacKillop James

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;28(3):291-298. doi: 10.1037/pha0000323. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000323
PMID:31556676
Abstract

The Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) affords a high-resolution index of the reinforcing efficacy of nicotine. Although a high number and steep progression of prices have traditionally been used, attention is now placed on developing brief measures of this task. This study sought to assess the psychometric properties of a brief CPT for assessing cigarette demand in treatment-seeking smokers with and without depressive symptoms. The study sample comprised 360 participants (210 with and 150 without depressive symptomatology). We tested the effect of different CPT price densities (14-19) on the variation of CPT indices and provided a thorough assessment of its reliability using 2 different approaches: the classical test theory and item response theory models. Reliability analyses indicated that the 14-item CPT performed the best in terms of reliability across study samples. The CPT's information functions for this shortened version yielded the highest precision at medium levels of the measured construct (for theta values between -0.4 and 0.4). O (nondepressed: discrimination parameter a = 14.66; depressed smokers: a = 6.73) and elasticity (nondepressed: a = -3.89; depressed smokers; a = -2.97) best discriminated between patients with different levels of cigarette demand. Results support the utility of item response theory to evaluate the precision of the CPT for different levels of the reinforcing efficacy of nicotine. A 14-item CPT stands as a reliable and efficient method for research and clinical purposes. This task performs particularly well with depressed and nondepressed smokers endorsing moderate levels of the CPT construct. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

香烟购买任务(CPT)提供了尼古丁强化效力的高分辨率指标。虽然传统上使用的是高价目数量和急剧递增的价格,但现在人们的注意力集中在开发该任务的简短测量方法上。本研究旨在评估一种简短CPT的心理测量特性,以评估有和没有抑郁症状的寻求治疗的吸烟者的香烟需求。研究样本包括360名参与者(210名有抑郁症状,150名没有抑郁症状)。我们测试了不同CPT价格密度(14 - 19)对CPT指标变化的影响,并使用两种不同方法对其信度进行了全面评估:经典测试理论和项目反应理论模型。信度分析表明,14项CPT在整个研究样本的信度方面表现最佳。该缩短版本的CPT的信息函数在测量结构的中等水平(θ值在 - 0.4和0.4之间)产生了最高精度。O(非抑郁者:区分参数a = 14.66;抑郁吸烟者:a = 6.73)和弹性(非抑郁者:a = - 3.89;抑郁吸烟者:a = - 2.97)能最好地区分不同香烟需求水平的患者。结果支持项目反应理论在评估CPT对尼古丁不同强化效力水平的精度方面的效用。14项CPT是一种可靠且高效的研究和临床方法。对于认可CPT结构中等水平的抑郁和非抑郁吸烟者,该任务表现尤其出色。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Characterizing the reinforcing value of tobacco using a cigarette purchase task: An item response theory approach.使用香烟购买任务表征烟草的强化价值:一种项目反应理论方法。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;28(3):291-298. doi: 10.1037/pha0000323. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Cigarette demand among smokers with elevated depressive symptoms: an experimental comparison with low depressive symptoms.有抑郁症状的吸烟者中的香烟需求:与低抑郁症状者的实验比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Mar;235(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4788-1. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
Validity and reliability of the cigarette purchase task when participant cigarette consumption is unconstrained.当参与者的香烟消费量不受限制时,香烟购买任务的有效性和可靠性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Feb;33(1):77-83. doi: 10.1037/pha0000742. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Brief Assessment of Cigarette Demand (BACD): Initial development and correlational results in adults and adolescents.Brief 评估香烟需求(BACD):成年人和青少年的初步发展和相关结果。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Oct;27(5):496-501. doi: 10.1037/pha0000267. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
No evidence of the clinical utility of single-item breakpoint to inform on tobacco demand in persons with substance use disorders.没有证据表明单项切点对于了解物质使用障碍者的烟草需求具有临床实用性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Sep;238(9):2525-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05875-y. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Validation of a brief behavioral economic assessment of demand among cigarette smokers.吸烟人群需求的简短行为经济学评估的验证
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Feb;27(1):96-102. doi: 10.1037/pha0000228. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Examining the latent factor structure of a hypothetical cigarette purchase task among pregnant women.检验孕妇假设香烟购买任务的潜在因子结构。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;31(1):23-28. doi: 10.1037/pha0000571. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Latent Structure of the Cigarette Purchase Task Among Treatment-Seeking Smokers With Depression and Its Predictive Validity on Smoking Abstinence.治疗性寻求戒烟的抑郁症患者中香烟购买任务的潜在结构及其对戒烟的预测效度。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jan 27;22(1):74-80. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty236.
9
Using the Cigarette Purchase Task to examine the relative reinforcing value of cigarettes among mothers with versus without opioid dependence.使用香烟购买任务来比较有和没有阿片类药物依赖的母亲的香烟相对强化价值。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;28(6):706-713. doi: 10.1037/pha0000353. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes as a predictor of smoking abstinence among treatment-seeking smokers.香烟的相对强化效力作为寻求治疗的吸烟者戒烟预测指标的研究
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Sep;233(17):3103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4350-6. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent validity of the marijuana purchase task: a meta-analysis of trait-level cannabis demand and cannabis involvement.大麻购买任务的同时效度:特质水平大麻需求和大麻卷入的元分析。
Addiction. 2023 Apr;118(4):620-633. doi: 10.1111/add.16075. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
2
No evidence of the clinical utility of single-item breakpoint to inform on tobacco demand in persons with substance use disorders.没有证据表明单项切点对于了解物质使用障碍者的烟草需求具有临床实用性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Sep;238(9):2525-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05875-y. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Validation of an E-cigarette Purchase Task in Advanced Generation Device Users.
验证高级电子烟设备使用者的电子烟购买任务。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1851-1859. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa060.
4
Behavioral economic measurement of cigarette demand: A descriptive review of published approaches to the cigarette purchase task.行为经济学对香烟需求的衡量:香烟购买任务中已出版方法的描述性综述。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;28(6):688-705. doi: 10.1037/pha0000347. Epub 2020 Jan 20.