Department of Radiology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033.
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Dec;213(6):1274-1283. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21121. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
The aim of this study was to assess trainees' and practicing radiologists' perceptions and experiences in handling ethical situations. We sought to identify frequently encountered ethical dilemmas and how they are addressed in daily practice. A questionnaire on ethics was sent by email invitation to 1569 radiologists and radiology trainees in an institutional database maintained for continuing medical education purposes on three separate occasions between September 17, 2016, and October 31, 2016. The link to the survey was also posted on social media sites via the authors' and institutional accounts on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Aunt Minnie as well as on American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America web blogs. A total of 424 radiologists and trainees responded to the survey, for a response rate of 27% (424/1569). Of them, 363 responded to a question asking whether they had witnessed an ethical dilemma; 203 (56%) had. The wording of reports when a miss was discovered was not handled in a consistent fashion. Regarding disclosure, trainees were more likely than practicing radiologists to report theirs and others' errors to the patient. Of the 362 respondents who responded to a question about whether they would report a negligent act by a colleague to the group director, 292 (81%) stated that they would, but trainees were less likely than practicing radiologists to do so. This study found many common ethical dilemmas in radiology practices remain without an appropriate, objective, and unified approach to effectively guide the radiologist's actions. These results highlight a need to provide more uniform recommendations to assist radiologists in addressing ethical issues in an appropriate manner.
本研究旨在评估受训者和执业放射科医师在处理伦理问题时的看法和经验。我们试图确定在日常实践中经常遇到的伦理困境以及如何解决这些问题。
我们通过电子邮件邀请,于 2016 年 9 月 17 日至 10 月 31 日期间分三次向机构数据库中的 1569 名放射科医师和放射科医师学员发送了一份关于伦理问题的问卷,该数据库用于继续教育目的。作者和机构的 Facebook、Twitter、Instagram 和 AuntMinnie 账户以及美国放射学院和北美放射学会博客上也发布了调查链接。共有 424 名放射科医师和学员对调查做出了回应,回应率为 27%(424/1569)。其中,363 人回答了是否目睹过伦理困境的问题;203 人(56%)目睹过。发现错误时的报告措辞没有一致的处理方式。关于披露,受训者比执业放射科医师更有可能向患者报告自己和他人的错误。在 362 名回答是否会向主任报告同事疏忽行为的受访者中,292 名(81%)表示会报告,但受训者报告的可能性比执业放射科医师低。
本研究发现,放射科实践中仍存在许多常见的伦理困境,缺乏适当、客观和统一的方法来有效指导放射科医生的行动。这些结果强调需要提供更统一的建议,以帮助放射科医生以适当的方式处理伦理问题。