Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):3000-3008. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02306. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
We have previously reported on the 3-year results of the phase III German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group trial (DeCOG; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02434107) comparing distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy who were randomly assigned to complete lymph node dissection (CLND) or observation. Here, we report the final analysis with 72 months of median follow up.
The multicenter randomized phase III trial included patients with cutaneous melanoma of the trunk and extremities who were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo CLND or observation. DMFS was analyzed as the primary end point, and RFS, OS, and recurrences in the regional lymph node basin were secondary end points. The analysis was by intention to treat. Disease and survival information were collected quarterly.
From January 2006 to December 2014, 5,547 patients were screened to identify 1,256 with metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Of these, 483 (39%) were included: 241 in the observation arm and 242 in the CLND arm. In the final analysis, median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range, 67-77 months). No significant treatment-related difference was seen in the 5-year DMFS between the observation and CLND arms (67.6% 64.9%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; = .87). The 5-year RFS and OS also showed no difference (HR, 1.01 and 0.99, respectively). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects occurred in 32 patients (13%) in the CLND arm; lymphedema (n = 20) and delayed wound healing (n = 5) were most common and no serious adverse events were reported.
The final results of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group trial with a median follow up of 72 months showed higher event rates, but similar HRs compared with those at the 3-year analysis. These results confirm that immediate CLND in SLN-positive patients is not superior to observation in terms of DMFS, RFS, or OS and support not recommending CLND in patients with SLN metastasis.
我们曾报道过 III 期德国皮肤病合作肿瘤学组(DeCOG)试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02434107)的 3 年结果,该试验比较了接受前哨淋巴结活检阳性的患者在随机分配至行完全淋巴结清扫术(CLND)或观察的情况下无远处转移生存(DMFS)、无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)的差异。在此,我们报告了中位随访 72 个月的最终分析结果。
这项多中心、随机 III 期试验纳入了躯干和四肢皮肤黑素瘤患者,他们被随机(1:1)分配至行 CLND 或观察。DMFS 为主要终点,RFS、OS 和区域淋巴结内的复发为次要终点。分析采用意向治疗。每季度收集疾病和生存信息。
2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月,对 5547 例患者进行了筛选,以确定 1256 例前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移患者。其中,483 例(39%)被纳入:观察组 241 例,CLND 组 242 例。最终分析时,中位随访时间为 72 个月(四分位距,67-77 个月)。观察组和 CLND 组之间 5 年 DMFS 无显著的治疗相关差异(分别为 67.6%和 64.9%;风险比[HR],1.08; =.87)。5 年 RFS 和 OS 也无差异(HR,分别为 1.01 和 0.99)。CLND 组 32 例(13%)患者发生 3 级和 4 级不良事件;最常见的是淋巴水肿(n = 20)和延迟伤口愈合(n = 5),未报告严重不良事件。
中位随访 72 个月的德国皮肤病合作肿瘤学组试验的最终结果显示,与 3 年分析相比,事件发生率更高,但 HR 相似。这些结果证实,对于 SLN 阳性患者,立即行 CLND 并不优于观察,在 DMFS、RFS 或 OS 方面并无优势,支持不建议对 SLN 转移患者行 CLND。