• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可能与冠状动脉旁路移植术后死亡率增加相关:一项荟萃分析。

Prior Percutaneous Coronary Interventions May Be Associated With Increased Mortality After Coronary Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Department of Surgery, Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Spring;32(1):59-74. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.09.009
PMID:31557513
Abstract

There is conflicting evidence for adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with prior percutaneous intervention (PCI). A literature search was performed from 1998 to 2017 and articles with primary or secondary outcomes of survival, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and myocardial infarction in CABG patients with prior PCI were included. Forest plots were generated from odds ratios for survival, MACE, and myocardial infarction for unmatched and propensity-matched data. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed for all outcomes using I. Funnel plots were generated for early survival, survival at 5 years, survival at >5 years, and MACE. Thirty-one studies were included over 18 years with 194,544 patients without PCI prior to CABG and 23,519 patients (12.09%) with prior PCI. Prior PCI did not adversely affect survival among the included studies (inverse rate ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.27, P = 0.110. MACE was significantly worse for those with prior PCI (odds ratio: 1.26, confidence interval: 1.02-1.55, P = 0.03). The relative risk of mortality associated with prior PCI has decreased significantly over the last 2 decades. Studies with higher percentage of prior PCI patients had higher relative mortalities. There was significant heterogeneity between studies for the treatment effects. PCI prior to CABG in recent times does not adversely affect survival despite adverse early and late MACE rates. However, high institutional rates of prior PCI may be associated with increasing mortality after CABG.

摘要

先前经皮介入(PCI)的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后出现不良结局的证据相互矛盾。从 1998 年到 2017 年进行了文献检索,纳入了主要或次要结局为生存、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和 CABG 患者先前 PCI 后心肌梗死的文章。从未匹配和倾向匹配数据中生成了用于生存、MACE 和心肌梗死的森林图。使用 I 评估了所有结果的研究间异质性。为早期生存、5 年生存、>5 年生存和 MACE 生成了漏斗图。在过去 18 年中,共纳入了 31 项研究,共有 194544 名未行 PCI 的 CABG 患者和 23519 名(12.09%)先前行 PCI 的患者。先前的 PCI 并没有对纳入研究中的生存产生不利影响(倒数风险比:1.12,95%置信区间:0.98-1.27,P=0.110)。对于那些先前有 PCI 的患者,MACE 明显更差(比值比:1.26,置信区间:1.02-1.55,P=0.03)。在过去的 20 年中,与先前 PCI 相关的死亡率相对风险显著下降。先前 PCI 患者比例较高的研究相对死亡率较高。研究之间的治疗效果存在显著异质性。尽管早期和晚期 MACE 发生率不利,但最近 CABG 前的 PCI 并不影响生存。然而,高机构 PCI 率可能与 CABG 后死亡率的增加有关。

相似文献

1
Prior Percutaneous Coronary Interventions May Be Associated With Increased Mortality After Coronary Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可能与冠状动脉旁路移植术后死亡率增加相关:一项荟萃分析。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Spring;32(1):59-74. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgical Myocardial Revascularization: Results From the E-CABG (European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) With a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与外科血运重建患者的死亡率:E-CABG(欧洲冠状动脉旁路移植术多中心研究)的系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005650.
3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Coronary Arteries Versus Bypass Grafts in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的应用:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):884-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.034. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
5
Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization.手术与介入性血管重建术相比,糖尿病患者的长期生存率得到提高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.035. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: Results From the EXCEL Trial.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗有既往脑血管疾病患者的比较:EXCEL 试验结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2441-2450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.008.
7
Validation of the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SYNTAX Score (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus) as a Prognostic Marker for Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.冠状动脉旁路移植术SYNTAX评分(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的协同作用)作为既往接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后预后标志物的验证
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003459.
8
Long term outcomes of new generation drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel and/or left main coronary artery disease. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新一代药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结局:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):671-678. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;35(3). doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12260.
10
Does prior percutaneous coronary intervention adversely affect early and mid-term survival after coronary artery surgery?既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是否会对冠状动脉搭桥术后的早期和中期生存产生不利影响?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):758-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.04.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 308,284 patients.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者先前的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及预后:对308,284例患者的荟萃分析
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 May 13;13:20406223221078755. doi: 10.1177/20406223221078755. eCollection 2022.