Finessi Monica, Liberini Virginia, Deandreis Désirée
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Sep;63(3):258-266. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.19.03211-4. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
The 2013/59 EURATOM directive defines all nuclear medicine applications for therapeutic purpose as a form of radiotherapy and underlines the need of both justification and optimization of these procedures, including radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) with [131I] for metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In metastatic DTC, optimal activity to be administered to achieve the best response rate with limited toxicity is still a matter of debate and international guidelines do not provide univocal recommendations on the preferable use of empiric versus a dosimetry-based approach in these patients. The purpose of this literature review is to describe the possible limits of dosimetry in RAIT planning according to methodological aspects, tumoral heterogeneity and to report clinical data on the impact on patients' outcome of different approaches. Due to the lack of standardized dosimetry protocols and clinical data assessing the superiority of a dosimetry-based vs an empiric approach in these patients, there is a need of standardisation and prospective, properly conducted studies to validate and to assess the best approach.
2013/59号欧盟原子能共同体指令将所有用于治疗目的的核医学应用定义为一种放射治疗形式,并强调了对这些程序进行正当性论证和优化的必要性,包括用[131I]进行放射性碘治疗(RAIT)以治疗转移性分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)。在转移性DTC中,为在有限毒性的情况下实现最佳缓解率而给予的最佳活度仍是一个有争议的问题,国际指南并未就这些患者中经验性方法与基于剂量测定法的方法的优选使用提供明确建议。本综述的目的是根据方法学方面、肿瘤异质性描述RAIT规划中剂量测定法可能存在的局限性,并报告不同方法对患者预后影响的临床数据。由于缺乏标准化的剂量测定方案以及评估基于剂量测定法与经验性方法在这些患者中的优越性的临床数据,因此需要进行标准化以及前瞻性的、恰当开展的研究,以验证并评估最佳方法。