Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Division of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Dec;229(6):596-608.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
Near infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) can guide intraoperative parathyroid gland (PG) identification. NIRAF detection devices typically rely on imaging and fiber probe-based approaches. Imaging modalities provide NIRAF pictures on adjacent display monitors, and fiber probe-based systems measure tissue NIRAF and provide real-time quantitative information to objectively aid PG identification. Both device types recently gained FDA approval for PG identification but have never been compared directly.
Patients undergoing thyroidectomy and/or parathyroidectomy were recruited prospectively. Target tissues were intraoperatively visualized with PDE-Neo II (imaging-based) and concurrently assessed with PTeye (fiber probe-based). For PDE-Neo II, NIRAF images were collected from in situ or excised tissues, alongside the surgeon's interpretation of visualized tissues, and retrospectively analyzed in a blinded fashion. The PTeye was concomitantly used to record NIRAF intensities and ratios from the same tissues in real time.
Twenty patients were enrolled for concurrent evaluation with both systems, which included 33 PGs and 19 nonparathyroid sites. NIRAF imaging demonstrated 90.9% sensitivity, 73.7% specificity, and 84.6% accuracy for PG identification when interpreted in real time by the surgeon compared with 81.8% sensitivity, 73.7% specificity, and 78.8% accuracy where images were quantitatively analyzed post hoc by an independent observer. In parallel, NIRAF detection with PTeye yielded 97.0% sensitivity, 84.2% specificity, and 92.3% accuracy in real time for the same specimens.
Both NIRAF-based systems were beneficial for identifying PGs intraoperatively. Although NIRAF imaging provides valuable spatial information to localize PGs, NIRAF detection with fiber probe provides real-time quantitative information to identify PGs in presence of ambient room lights.
近红外自体荧光(NIRAF)可用于指导术中甲状旁腺(PG)的识别。NIRAF 检测设备通常依赖于成像和光纤探头方法。成像方式在相邻的显示器上提供 NIRAF 图像,而基于光纤探头的系统则测量组织的 NIRAF 并提供实时定量信息,以客观地辅助 PG 识别。这两种设备类型最近均获得了 FDA 对 PG 识别的批准,但从未直接进行过比较。
前瞻性招募接受甲状腺切除术和/或甲状旁腺切除术的患者。使用 PDE-Neo II(基于成像)和 PTeye(基于光纤探头)对目标组织进行术中可视化。对于 PDE-Neo II,从原位或切除的组织中收集 NIRAF 图像,同时由外科医生对可视化组织进行解释,并以盲法进行回顾性分析。PTeye 同时用于实时记录来自相同组织的 NIRAF 强度和比值。
共有 20 名患者同时接受了两种系统的评估,其中包括 33 个 PG 和 19 个非甲状旁腺部位。与独立观察者事后进行定量分析相比,实时由外科医生解释 NIRAF 成像时,PG 识别的敏感性分别为 90.9%、73.7%和 84.6%,特异性分别为 73.7%、81.8%和 78.8%,准确性分别为 84.6%、78.8%和 81.8%。同时,PTeye 平行检测实时获得了相同标本 97.0%、84.2%和 92.3%的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
两种基于 NIRAF 的系统均有助于术中识别 PG。尽管 NIRAF 成像提供了有价值的空间信息来定位 PG,但光纤探头的 NIRAF 检测在环境光下提供了实时定量信息来识别 PG。