Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):527-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
This article reviews the clinical and radiographic outcomes in a noninferiority trial use of a transosseous knotless anchor to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in a patient cohort that have an increased incidence of osteoporosis.
Patients aged over 60 with a documented rotator cuff tear and who failed a rehab program underwent repair using an arthroscopic transosseous knotless (ATOK) anchor. Patients were prospectively reviewed using shoulder functional assessments (age-adjusted Constant score, Oxford Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores), and underwent preoperative as well as 1-, 3-, and 12-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
15 patients had undergone rotator cuff repair using the ATOK and were followed for a minimum of 24 months (range 24-30 months). From preoperative to 24 months post repair, median scores improved for ASES (61-89), Oxford (26-44), Constant (62-91), and VAS Pain (5-0.5). Four patients developed a partial retear of their repair, but only 1 patient sustained a complete retear: Sugaya type I, 10; type II, 1; type III, 2; type IV, 1; and type V, 1. No anchors were displaced, and there were no osteolysis, neurologic, or technique-related complications.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using a transosseous knotless technique has achieved a satisfactory outcome in this group of patients, who typically have poor bone quality, increasing the risk of antegrade anchor pullout. This approach would appear to combine the potential biomechanical and biological advantages of a transosseous repair technique, with the benefits of the lower morbidity arthroscopic surgical approach.
本文回顾了一项非劣效性试验的临床和影像学结果,该试验使用经皮无结锚钉修复伴有骨质疏松症高发风险的患者的肩袖撕裂。
60 岁以上、有肩袖撕裂病史且经康复治疗失败的患者,采用关节镜下经皮无结锚钉(ATOK)修复。前瞻性评估患者的肩部功能(年龄调整后的 Constant 评分、牛津肩评分、美国肩肘外科医生协会标准肩部评估表[ASES]、视觉模拟评分[VAS]疼痛评分),并进行术前及术后 1、3 和 12 个月的磁共振成像检查。
15 例患者采用 ATOK 行肩袖修复,随访时间至少 24 个月(24-30 个月)。与术前相比,术后 24 个月时 ASES(61-89)、牛津(26-44)、Constant(62-91)和 VAS 疼痛(5-0.5)评分中位数均有所改善。4 例患者出现部分修复撕裂,仅 1 例出现完全修复撕裂:Sugaya Ⅰ型 10 例,Ⅱ型 1 例,Ⅲ型 2 例,Ⅳ型 1 例,Ⅴ型 1 例。无锚钉移位,无骨质溶解、神经或技术相关并发症。
对于伴有骨质疏松症、前向锚钉拔出风险增加的患者,经皮无结锚钉关节镜肩袖修复术可获得满意的疗效。这种方法似乎结合了经皮修复技术的潜在生物力学和生物学优势,以及关节镜手术较低的发病率优势。