Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bone Joint J. 2019 Oct;101-B(10):1192-1198. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2019-0456.R2.
Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies of vitamin E-doped, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) liners show low head penetration rates in cementless acetabular components. There is, however, currently no data on cemented VEPE acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of a new cemented VEPE component, compared with a conventional polyethylene (PE) component regarding migration, head penetration, and clinical results.
We enrolled 42 patients (21 male, 21 female) with osteoarthritis and a mean age of 67 years (sd 5), in a double-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. The subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a reverse hybrid THA with a cemented component of either argon-gas gamma-sterilized PE component (controls) or VEPE, with identical geometry. The primary endpoint was proximal implant migration of the component at two years postoperatively measured with RSA. Secondary endpoints included total migration of the component, penetration of the femoral head into the component, and patient-reported outcome measurements.
In total, 19 control implants and 18 implants in the VEPE group were analyzed for the primary endpoint. We found a continuous proximal migration of the component in the VEPE group that was significantly higher with a difference at two years of a mean 0.21 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.37; p = 0.013). The total migration was also significantly higher in the VEPE group, but femoral head penetration was lower. We found no difference in clinical outcomes between the groups.
At two years, this cemented VEPE component, although having a low head penetration and excellent clinical results, failed to meet noninferiority compared with the conventional implant by a proximal migration above the proposed safety threshold of RSA. The early proximal migration pattern of the VEPE component is a reason for continued monitoring, although a specific threshold for proximal migration and risk for later failure cannot be defined and needs further study. Cite this article: 2019;101-B:1192-1198.
放射立体测量分析(RSA)研究表明,维生素 E 掺杂的高度交联聚乙烯(VEPE)衬垫在非骨水泥髋臼组件中头部穿透率较低。然而,目前在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,还没有关于骨水泥 VEPE 髋臼组件的数据。本研究的目的是评估一种新型骨水泥 VEPE 组件的安全性,与传统聚乙烯(PE)组件相比,该组件在迁移、头部穿透和临床结果方面的安全性。
我们招募了 42 名(21 名男性,21 名女性)患有骨关节炎的患者,平均年龄为 67 岁(标准差为 5 岁),进行了一项双盲、非劣效性、随机对照试验。受试者以 1:1 的比例随机分为接受骨水泥固定组件的反向杂交 THA 的两组,一组为氩气γ射线灭菌的 PE 组件(对照组),另一组为 VEPE 组件,两组的几何形状相同。主要终点是术后两年用 RSA 测量的组件近端植入物的迁移。次要终点包括组件的总迁移、股骨头穿透组件的深度和患者报告的结果测量。
共有 19 个对照组和 18 个 VEPE 组的植入物用于分析主要终点。我们发现 VEPE 组的组件有连续的近端迁移,在两年时的差异为平均 0.21 毫米(95%置信区间(CI)0.05 至 0.37;p = 0.013),差异具有统计学意义。VEPE 组的总迁移也明显较高,但股骨头穿透较低。两组的临床结果无差异。
在两年时,尽管这种骨水泥 VEPE 组件具有较低的头部穿透率和出色的临床结果,但由于近端迁移超过 RSA 建议的安全性阈值,与传统植入物相比未能达到非劣效性。VEPE 组件的早期近端迁移模式是继续监测的原因,尽管无法确定近端迁移的特定阈值和后期失败的风险,需要进一步研究。