Suppr超能文献

比较颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术患者 30 天再入院率的全国趋势。

Comparison of nationwide trends in 30-day readmission rates after carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Mich.

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University-Sparrow Hospital, Lansing, Mich.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1222-1232.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.190. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid revascularization procedures, carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), are among the most common vascular interventions performed in the United States, with significant resource utilization. Whereas multiple studies have reported outcomes after these procedures, data regarding 30-day readmission rates after these interventions remain scant.

METHODS

The U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database (2010-2014) was queried to identify all patients ≥18 years who were readmitted within 30 days after a hospital discharge for CEA or CAS.

RESULTS

Among 476,260 patients included, 13.5% underwent CAS and 86.5% underwent CEA. The combined 30-day readmission rate for all carotid revascularization procedures was 9.2% (10.6% after CAS and 9.0% after CEA). After 1:3 propensity matching, CAS was associated with higher risk of readmission compared with CEA (10.4% vs 9.4%). Neurologic complications and cardiac conditions were the two most common causes of readmission after both CAS (29.7% and 23.7%, respectively) and CEA (28.2% and 21.7%, respectively). The 30-day readmission rates were higher in CAS patients across all age groups as well as in those with a low or high baseline burden of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide study, CAS was associated with higher 30-day readmission rates compared with CEA irrespective of age or baseline burden of comorbidities. Neurologic or cardiac adverse events were responsible for >50% of readmissions after CAS and CEA.

摘要

目的

颈动脉血运重建术(颈动脉内膜切除术,CEA 和颈动脉支架置入术,CAS)是美国最常见的血管介入治疗方法之一,需要大量的资源。虽然多项研究报告了这些手术的结果,但关于这些干预措施后 30 天内再入院率的数据仍然很少。

方法

使用美国全国再入院数据库(2010-2014 年),调查所有年龄≥18 岁的患者,他们在接受 CEA 或 CAS 治疗出院后 30 天内再次入院。

结果

在纳入的 476260 名患者中,13.5%接受了 CAS 治疗,86.5%接受了 CEA 治疗。所有颈动脉血运重建术的 30 天再入院率为 9.2%(CAS 后为 10.6%,CEA 后为 9.0%)。在 1:3 倾向评分匹配后,CAS 与 CEA 相比,再入院风险更高(10.4%比 9.4%)。神经并发症和心脏疾病是 CAS(分别为 29.7%和 23.7%)和 CEA(分别为 28.2%和 21.7%)后再入院的两个最常见原因。在所有年龄组和基线合并症负担较低或较高的 CAS 患者中,30 天再入院率均较高。

结论

在这项大型全国性研究中,与 CEA 相比,CAS 与较高的 30 天再入院率相关,无论年龄或基线合并症负担如何。神经或心脏不良事件是 CAS 和 CEA 后再入院的>50%的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验