Suppr超能文献

卵巢刺激对卵母细胞玻璃化并不改变早期乳腺癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率。

Ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification does not modify disease-free survival and overall survival rates in patients with early breast cancer.

机构信息

IVIRMA Vigo, Plaza Francisco Fernández del Riego, 7 36203, Vigo Pontevedra, Spain.

IVIRMA Las Palmas.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Nov;39(5):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification affect disease-free survival and overall survival rates in women with early breast cancer?

DESIGN

This cohort study included 259 patients with early breast cancer; 148 patients underwent ovarian stimulation, whereas 111 patients did not. Patients were treated between January 2008 and December 2016. To calculate the disease-free survival time and overall survival rate, the time of definitive surgery was defined as the starting point. The follow-up was conducted up to 5 years.

RESULTS

Exposed and non-exposed groups were comparable in tumour, node and metastases classification, Nottingham grade, hormonal receptor status, tumour molecular phenotype, histology and pathology stage. The exposed group was younger than the non-exposed. Recurrences occurred in 9/148 women (6.1%) in the exposed group and 15/111 women (13.5%) in the non-exposed group, with no significant difference. The mean disease-free survival time was 63.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.5-66.4) in the exposed group and 60.6 months (95% CI: 56.9-64.2) in the non-exposed, with no significant difference (log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test). Overall survival rates were comparable; 2/148 (1.4%) and 4/111 (3.6%) patients died, in exposed and non-exposed groups, respectively, during the period analysed. Mean overall survival times were 67.2 months (95% CI: 66.2-68.2) in the exposed group and 65.9 months (95% CI: 64.0-67.9) in the unexposed, with no significant difference (log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ovarian stimulation in patients with early-stage breast cancer is safe in the long term.

摘要

研究问题

卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的卵巢刺激是否会影响早期乳腺癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率?

设计

这项队列研究纳入了 259 例早期乳腺癌患者;其中 148 例患者接受了卵巢刺激,111 例患者未接受。这些患者的治疗时间在 2008 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月之间。为了计算无病生存时间和总生存率,将明确手术的时间定义为起始点。随访时间最长为 5 年。

结果

暴露组和非暴露组在肿瘤、淋巴结和转移分类、诺丁汉分级、激素受体状态、肿瘤分子表型、组织学和病理分期方面具有可比性。暴露组患者比非暴露组患者年轻。暴露组有 9 例(6.1%)患者发生复发,非暴露组有 15 例(13.5%)患者发生复发,差异无统计学意义。暴露组的无病生存时间平均为 63.9 个月(95%置信区间:61.5-66.4),非暴露组为 60.6 个月(95%置信区间:56.9-64.2),差异无统计学意义(对数秩[Mantel-Cox]检验)。总生存率无差异;暴露组和非暴露组分别有 2 例(1.4%)和 4 例(3.6%)患者在分析期间死亡。暴露组的总生存时间平均为 67.2 个月(95%置信区间:66.2-68.2),非暴露组为 65.9 个月(95%置信区间:64.0-67.9),差异无统计学意义(对数秩[Mantel-Cox]检验)。

结论

本研究表明,在早期乳腺癌患者中进行卵巢刺激在长期来看是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验