Samson R H, Scher L A, Veith F J
Surgery. 1985 Apr;97(4):385-96.
CSAD provides a challenge for the vascular surgeon. Patients are older, sicker, and at greater risk than are patients with unisegmental disease. Similarly, symptoms are more severe and limb loss is more frequent. A multitude of different reconstructive techniques are available, but their injudicious or untimely use can not only fail to improve the patient but can also cause limb loss or death. Their use must be predicated by a differentiation of which arterial segments are hemodynamically involved, yet this determination may not be possible even after extensive noninvasive and invasive investigation. To optimize the approach to these patients, the following principles should be employed. First, incapacitating claudication is a valid indication for a suprainguinal inflow procedure in a good-risk patient. However, indications for surgery should usually be limited to limb salvage, especially if an infrainguinal procedure is contemplated. Medical conditions such as heart failure and diabetes should be improved before arteriography. The latter should delineate the entire infrarenal arterial system, with special attention to the iliac, deep femoral, and pedal arteries. Oblique views may be of critical importance. Noninvasive hemodynamic tests should be used to confirm the need for arterial reconstruction and help delineate areas of functional stenosis. Direct pull-through pressure measurements may be required for ultimate confirmation. If proximal disease is thus defined, as proximal inflow operation should usually be sufficient unless there is extensive gangrene of the foot, in which case synchronous distal grafts may be required. If the proximal graft alone is performed, the patient must be followed closely since approximately 10% of patients may need subsequent distal reconstructions. The role of the "runoff" segments such as the deep femoral artery, popliteal trifurcation, and pedal arteries may be critical. Every effort should be made to ensure flow through these vessels. Profundoplasty alone is seldom indicated but is often a valuable adjunct to other reconstructive procedures. Lumbar sympathectomy is seldom required. PTA is becoming a valuable adjunct to treatment of CSAD, and intraoperative dilatation also has potential attributes. If such an approach is followed, lasting limb salvage with minimal morbidity should be achieved in most patients with CSAD.
慢性严重下肢缺血(CSAD)给血管外科医生带来了挑战。与单节段疾病患者相比,CSAD患者年龄更大、病情更重、风险更高。同样,症状更严重,肢体缺失更常见。有多种不同的重建技术可供选择,但不合理或不及时地使用这些技术不仅无法改善患者病情,还可能导致肢体缺失或死亡。其使用必须基于对哪些动脉节段存在血流动力学受累情况的区分,但即使经过广泛的无创和有创检查,也可能无法做出这种判断。为了优化对这些患者的治疗方法,应遵循以下原则。首先,对于风险较低的患者,致残性间歇性跛行是进行腹股沟上流入道手术的合理指征。然而,手术指征通常应限于肢体挽救,特别是在考虑进行腹股沟下手术时。在进行动脉造影之前,应改善心力衰竭和糖尿病等内科疾病。动脉造影应描绘出整个肾下腹主动脉系统,特别要关注髂动脉、股深动脉和足部动脉。斜位片可能至关重要。应使用无创血流动力学检查来确认动脉重建的必要性,并帮助确定功能性狭窄区域。最终确认可能需要直接进行牵拉通过压力测量。如果确定存在近端疾病,除非足部有广泛坏疽,通常进行近端流入道手术就足够了,在这种情况下可能需要同步进行远端移植。如果仅进行近端移植,必须密切随访患者,因为约10%的患者可能需要后续的远端重建。诸如股深动脉、腘动脉三叉分支和足部动脉等“流出道”节段的作用可能至关重要。应尽一切努力确保这些血管有血流。单独进行股深动脉成形术很少有指征,但通常是其他重建手术的有价值辅助手段。很少需要进行腰交感神经切除术。经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)正成为治疗CSAD的有价值辅助手段,术中扩张也有潜在优势。如果遵循这种方法,大多数CSAD患者应能实现以最低发病率实现持久的肢体挽救。