The Prostate Centre, London, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13429. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13429. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
Therapeutic drug switching is commonplace across a broad range of indications and, within a drug class, is often facilitated by the availability of multiple drugs considered equivalent. Such treatment changes are often considered to improve outcomes via better efficacy or fewer side effects, or to be more cost-effective. Drug switching can be both appropriate and beneficial for several reasons; however, switching can also be associated with negative consequences.
To consider the impact of switching in two situations: the use of statins as a well-studied example of within-class drug switching, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-targeting drug switching as an example of cross-class switching.
With the example of statins, within-class switching may be justified to reduce side effects, although the decision to switch is often also driven by the lower cost of generic formulations. With the example of GnRH agonists/antagonists, switching often occurs without the realisation that these drugs belong to different classes, with potential clinical implications.
Lessons emerging from these examples will help inform healthcare practitioners who may be considering switching drug prescriptions.
在广泛的适应证中,治疗药物转换很常见,并且在药物类别内,通常可以通过提供多种被认为等效的药物来实现。这种治疗改变通常被认为可以通过提高疗效或减少副作用来改善结果,或者更具成本效益。药物转换出于多种原因既可以是合适的,也可以是有益的;但是,转换也可能会带来负面后果。
考虑在两种情况下进行药物转换的影响:将他汀类药物作为药物类别内药物转换的一个很好的研究示例,以及将促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)靶向药物转换作为跨类别药物转换的一个示例。
以他汀类药物为例,药物类别内的转换可能是合理的,可以减少副作用,尽管转换的决定通常也受到仿制药成本较低的驱动。以 GnRH 激动剂/拮抗剂为例,转换通常是在没有意识到这些药物属于不同类别的情况下发生的,可能会产生潜在的临床影响。
从这些例子中得出的经验教训将有助于为可能正在考虑转换药物处方的医疗保健从业者提供信息。