Suppr超能文献

损伤后并发症:致病因素的回顾性研究

Postinjury Complications: Retrospective Study of Causative Factors
.

作者信息

Warnack Elizabeth, Pachter Hersch Leon, Choi Beatrix, DiMaggio Charles, Frangos Spiros, Klein Michael, Bukur Marko

机构信息

NYU Langone Health/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Sep 26;6(3):e14819. doi: 10.2196/14819.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injury care involves the complex interaction of patient, physician, and environment that impacts patient complications, level of harm, and failure to rescue (FTR). FTR represents the likelihood of a hospital to be unable to rescue patients from death after in-hospital complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to hypothesize that error type and number of errors contribute to increased level of harm and FTR.

METHODS

Patient information was abstracted from weekly trauma performance improvement (PI) records (from January 1, 2016, to July 19, 2017), where trauma surgeons determined the level of harm and identified the factors associated with complications. Level of harm was determined by definitions set forth by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of individual factors on FTR and level of harm, controlling for age, gender, Charlson score, injury severity score (ISS), error (in diagnosis, technique, or judgment), delay (in diagnosis or intervention), and need for surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 2216 trauma patients presented during the study period. Of 2216 patients, 224 (224/2216, 10.10 %) had complications reported at PI meetings; of these, 31 patients (31/224, 13.8 %) had FTR. PI patients were more likely to be older (mean age 51.3 years, SE 1.58, vs 46.5 years, SE 0.51; P=.008) and have higher ISS (median 22 vs 8; P<.001), compared with patients without complications. Physician-attributable errors (odds ratio [OR] 2.82; P=.001), most commonly errors in technique, and nature of injury (OR 1.91; P=.01) were associated with higher levels of harm, whereas delays in diagnosis or intervention were not. Each additional factor involved increased level of harm (OR 2.09; P<.001) and nearly doubled likelihood of FTR (OR 1.95; P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Physician-attributable errors in diagnosis, technique, or judgment are more strongly correlated with harm than delays in diagnosis and intervention. Increasing number of errors identified in patient care correlates with an increasing level of harm and FTR.

摘要

背景

创伤护理涉及患者、医生和环境之间复杂的相互作用,这会影响患者的并发症、伤害程度及未能成功救治(FTR)情况。FTR表示医院在患者发生院内并发症后无法将其从死亡中挽救回来的可能性。

目的

本研究旨在假设错误类型和错误数量会导致伤害程度增加及FTR升高。

方法

从每周的创伤绩效改进(PI)记录(2016年1月1日至2017年7月19日)中提取患者信息,创伤外科医生确定伤害程度并识别与并发症相关的因素。伤害程度根据医疗保健研究与质量局规定的定义来确定。使用逻辑回归来确定个体因素对FTR和伤害程度的影响,并对年龄、性别、查尔森评分、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、错误(诊断、技术或判断方面)、延迟(诊断或干预方面)及手术需求进行控制。

结果

研究期间共有2216例创伤患者就诊。在2216例患者中,有224例(224/2216,10.10%)在PI会议上报告有并发症;其中,31例患者(31/224,13.8%)发生了FTR。与无并发症的患者相比,PI患者更可能年龄较大(平均年龄51.3岁,标准误1.58,而无并发症患者为46.5岁,标准误0.51;P = 0.008)且ISS较高(中位数22对8;P < 0.001)。医生归因的错误(比值比[OR] 2.82;P = 0.001),最常见的是技术错误,以及损伤性质(OR 1.91;P = 0.01)与较高的伤害程度相关,而诊断或干预延迟则不然。涉及的每个额外因素都会增加伤害程度(OR 2.09;P < 0.001)且FTR的可能性几乎翻倍(OR 1.95;P = 0.01)。

结论

医生在诊断、技术或判断方面的错误与伤害的相关性比诊断和干预延迟更强。在患者护理中发现的错误数量增加与伤害程度和FTR的增加相关。

相似文献

9

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验