• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健专业人员与患者在线互动的前因与后果:系统评价

The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Care Professional-Patient Online Interactions: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Shang Lili, Zuo Meiyun, Ma Dan, Yu Qinjun

机构信息

Research Institute of Smart Senior Care, School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

School of Basic Medicine, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e13940. doi: 10.2196/13940.

DOI:10.2196/13940
PMID:31573908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6785718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online health care services effectively supplement traditional medical treatment. The development of online health care services depends on sustained interactions between health care professionals (HCPs) and patients. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the demands and gains of health care stakeholders in HCP-patient online interactions and determine an agenda for future work.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to present a systematic review of the antecedents and consequences of HCP-patient online interactions. It seeks to reach a better understanding of why HCPs and patients are willing to interact with each other online and what the consequences of HCP-patient online interactions are for health care stakeholders. Based on this, we intend to identify the gaps in existing studies and make recommendations for future research.

METHODS

In accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic retrieval was carried out from the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus electronic databases. The search results were confined to those papers published in English between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2018. Selected studies were then evaluated for quality; studies that did not meet quality criteria were excluded from further analysis. Findings of the reviewed studies related to our research questions were extracted and synthesized through inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8440 records were found after the initial search, 28 papers of which were selected for analysis. Accessibility to HCPs, self-management, and unmet needs were the main triggers for patients to participate in online interaction. For HCPs, patient education, career needs, and self-promotion were the major reasons why they took the online approach. There were several aspects of the consequences of HCP-patient online interactions on health care stakeholders. Consequences for patients included patient empowerment, health promotion, and acquisition of uncertain answers. Consequences for HCPs included social and economic returns, lack of control over their role, and gaining more appointments. HCP-patient online interactions also improved communication efficiency in offline settings and helped managers of online health care settings get a better understanding of patients' needs. Health care stakeholders have also encountered ethical and legal issues during online interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a systematic review, we sought out the antecedents and consequences of HCP-patient online interactions to understand the triggers for HCPs and patients to participate and the consequences of participating. Potential future research topics are the influences on the chain of online interaction, specifications and principles of privacy design within online health care settings, and roles that sociodemographic and psychological characteristics play. Longitudinal studies and the adoption of text-mining method are worth encouraging. This paper is expected to contribute to the sustained progress of online health care settings.

摘要

背景

在线医疗服务有效地补充了传统医疗。在线医疗服务的发展依赖于医护人员(HCPs)与患者之间的持续互动。因此,有必要了解医护人员与患者在线互动中医护利益相关者的需求和收获,并确定未来工作的议程。

目的

本研究旨在对医护人员与患者在线互动的前因后果进行系统综述。旨在更好地理解医护人员和患者为何愿意在网上相互交流,以及医护人员与患者在线互动对医护利益相关者的影响。基于此,我们打算找出现有研究中的差距,并为未来研究提出建议。

方法

按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,从Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus电子数据库进行系统检索。检索结果限于2000年1月1日至2018年6月30日期间以英文发表的论文。然后对所选研究进行质量评估;不符合质量标准的研究被排除在进一步分析之外。通过归纳主题分析提取和综合与我们研究问题相关的综述研究结果。

结果

初步检索后共找到8440条记录,其中28篇论文被选作分析。患者能够接触到医护人员、自我管理和未满足的需求是患者参与在线互动的主要触发因素。对于医护人员来说,患者教育、职业需求和自我推广是他们采取在线方式的主要原因。医护人员与患者在线互动对医护利益相关者的影响有几个方面。对患者的影响包括患者赋权、健康促进和获得不确定的答案。对医护人员的影响包括社会和经济回报、对自身角色缺乏控制以及获得更多预约。医护人员与患者在线互动还提高了线下环境中的沟通效率,并帮助在线医疗环境的管理者更好地了解患者需求。医护利益相关者在在线互动中也遇到了伦理和法律问题。

结论

通过系统综述,我们找出了医护人员与患者在线互动的前因后果,以了解医护人员和患者参与的触发因素以及参与的后果。未来潜在的研究主题是对在线互动链条的影响、在线医疗环境中隐私设计的规范和原则,以及社会人口统计学和心理特征所起的作用。纵向研究和文本挖掘方法的采用值得鼓励。本文有望为在线医疗环境的持续发展做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a014/6785718/ef406d899a03/jmir_v21i9e13940_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a014/6785718/ed865f214cd6/jmir_v21i9e13940_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a014/6785718/ef406d899a03/jmir_v21i9e13940_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a014/6785718/ed865f214cd6/jmir_v21i9e13940_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a014/6785718/ef406d899a03/jmir_v21i9e13940_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Care Professional-Patient Online Interactions: Systematic Review.医疗保健专业人员与患者在线互动的前因与后果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e13940. doi: 10.2196/13940.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information.电子健康、参与式医疗与伦理关怀:一项关于患者及医疗服务提供者对健康相关互联网信息使用情况的焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3792.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review.社交媒体对医疗保健专业人员电子专业精神的危害和益处:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 17;23(11):e25770. doi: 10.2196/25770.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
AYAs' online information and eHealth needs: A comparison with healthcare professionals' perceptions.AYAs 的在线信息和电子健康需求:与医疗保健专业人员认知的比较。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2016-2026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5048. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
Implementation barriers and facilitators of remote monitoring, remote consultation and digital care platforms through the eyes of healthcare professionals: a review of reviews.远程监测、远程咨询和数字护理平台实施的障碍和促进因素:综述的综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e075833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075833.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the Modern Digital Information Environment on Maternal Health Care Professionals, the Role of Midwives, and the People in Their Care: Scoping Review.现代数字信息环境对孕产妇保健专业人员、助产士及其护理对象的影响:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 25;27:e70108. doi: 10.2196/70108.
2
Impact of a digital manual for guidance on malignant hyperthermia: patient education.数字化指导手册对恶性高热患者教育的影响
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02435-1.
3
Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Seeking and using intention of health information from doctors in social media: The effect of doctor-consumer interaction.从社交媒体中的医生处寻求和使用健康信息的意图:医患互动的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Patient-Physician Communication in the Era of Mobile Phones and Social Media Apps: Cross-Sectional Observational Study on Lebanese Physicians' Perceptions and Attitudes.手机和社交媒体应用时代的医患沟通:黎巴嫩医生认知与态度的横断面观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 6;6(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8895.
3
The Effect of Doctor-Consumer Interaction on Social Media on Consumers' Health Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Study.
一项支持慢性医疗保健中共同决策的数字患者-医疗服务提供者沟通干预措施(InvolveMe)的可行性:试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(4):e34738. doi: 10.2196/34738.
4
Persuasive Technologies and Social Interactions in Professional Environments: Embedded Qualitative Case Study.专业环境中的说服性技术与社交互动:嵌入式定性案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 23;6(2):e32613. doi: 10.2196/32613.
5
Communication Behavior Changes Between Patients With Diabetes and Healthcare Providers Over 9 Years: Retrospective Cohort Study.9 年间糖尿病患者与医护人员间的沟通行为变化:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17186. doi: 10.2196/17186.
6
Diabetes-Related Topics in an Online Forum for Caregivers of Individuals Living With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Qualitative Inquiry.针对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者照料者的在线论坛中与糖尿病相关的话题:定性调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e17851. doi: 10.2196/17851.
社交媒体上医患互动对消费者健康行为的影响:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 28;20(2):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9003.
4
Service provision, pricing, and patient satisfaction in online health communities.在线健康社区中的服务提供、定价和患者满意度。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Exploring web-mediated communication: A genre-based linguistic study for new patterns of doctor–patient interaction in online environment.探索网络介导的交流:一项基于体裁的语言学研究,关于在线环境中医患互动的新模式。
Commun Med. 2015;12(2-3):187-98. doi: 10.1558/cam.31897.
6
Online written consultation, telephone consultation and offline appointment: An examination of the channel effect in online health communities.在线书面咨询、电话咨询与线下预约:在线健康社区中的渠道效应考察
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:107-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
7
Evolving techniques in text-based medical consultation - Physicians' long-term experiences at an Ask the doctor service.基于文本的医疗咨询中的技术演变——医生在“向医生提问”服务中的长期经验
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 20.
8
The future of social media in orthopedic surgery.骨科手术中社交媒体的未来。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):278-279. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9412-9.
9
Analyzing and Predicting User Participations in Online Health Communities: A Social Support Perspective.从社会支持视角分析与预测用户在在线健康社区中的参与度
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 24;19(4):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6834.
10
Impact of Social Processes in Online Health Communities on Patient Empowerment in Relationship With the Physician: Emergence of Functional and Dysfunctional Empowerment.在线健康社区中的社会过程对患者在医患关系中的赋权的影响:功能性赋权与功能失调性赋权的出现
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 13;19(3):e74. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7002.