文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

远程监测、远程咨询和数字护理平台实施的障碍和促进因素:综述的综述。

Implementation barriers and facilitators of remote monitoring, remote consultation and digital care platforms through the eyes of healthcare professionals: a review of reviews.

机构信息

Outpatient Division, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e075833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075833.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075833
PMID:38858155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11168143/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Digital transformation in healthcare is a necessity considering the steady increase in healthcare costs, the growing ageing population and rising number of people living with chronic diseases. The implementation of digital health technologies in patient care is a potential solution to these issues, however, some challenges remain. In order to navigate such complexities, the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) must be considered. The objective of this umbrella review is to identify key barriers and facilitators involved in digital health technology implementation, from the perspective of HCPs. DESIGN: Systematic umbrella review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. DATA SOURCES: Embase.com, PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for existing reviews dated up to 17 June 2022. Search terms included digital health technology, combined with terms related to implementation, and variations in terms encompassing HCP, such as physician, doctor and the medical discipline. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Quantitative and qualitative reviews evaluating digital technologies that included patient interaction were considered eligible. Three reviewers independently synthesised and assessed eligible reviews and conducted a critical appraisal. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Regarding the data collection, two reviewers independently synthesised and interpreted data on barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Thirty-three reviews met the inclusion criteria. Barriers and facilitators were categorised into four levels: (1) the organisation, (2) the HCP, (3) the patient and (4) technical aspects. The main barriers and facilitators identified were (lack of) training (n=22/33), (un)familiarity with technology (n=17/33), (loss of) communication (n=13/33) and security and confidentiality issues (n=17/33). Barriers of key importance included increased workload (n=16/33), the technology undermining aspects of professional identity (n=11/33), HCP uncertainty about patients' aptitude with the technology (n=9/33), and technical issues (n=12/33). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation strategy should address the key barriers highlighted by HCPs, for instance, by providing adequate training to familiarise HCPs with the technology, adapting the technology to the patient preferences and addressing technical issues. Barriers on both HCP and patient levels can be overcome by investigating the needs of the end-users. As we shift from traditional face-to-face care models towards new modes of care delivery, further research is needed to better understand the role of digital technology in the HCP-patient relationship.

摘要

目的:考虑到医疗成本的稳步增长、人口老龄化以及慢性病患者人数的增加,医疗保健领域的数字化转型势在必行。在患者护理中实施数字健康技术是解决这些问题的潜在方法,但仍存在一些挑战。为了应对这些复杂性,必须考虑医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的看法。本综述伞的目的是从 HCP 的角度确定数字健康技术实施中涉及的主要障碍和促进因素。

设计:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行系统综述伞。

数据来源:截至 2022 年 6 月 17 日,检索 Embase.com、PubMed 和 Web of Science Core Collection 中现有的评论。搜索词包括数字健康技术,结合与实施相关的术语,以及涵盖 HCP 的术语变体,如医生、医生和医学学科。

入选标准:评估包含患者互动的数字技术的定量和定性评论被认为符合条件。三名评审员独立综合评估合格的评论并进行批判性评估。

数据提取和综合:关于数据收集,两名评审员独立综合并解释了障碍和促进因素的数据。

结果:33 项审查符合纳入标准。障碍和促进因素分为四个层次:(1)组织,(2)HCP,(3)患者和(4)技术方面。确定的主要障碍和促进因素包括培训不足(n=22/33)、对技术不熟悉(n=17/33)、沟通不畅(n=13/33)和安全与保密性问题(n=17/33)。重要的障碍包括工作量增加(n=16/33)、技术破坏专业身份方面(n=11/33)、HCP 对患者使用技术能力的不确定性(n=9/33)和技术问题(n=12/33)。

结论:实施策略应解决 HCP 强调的主要障碍,例如,通过提供足够的培训使 HCP熟悉技术、使技术适应患者的偏好以及解决技术问题。可以通过调查最终用户的需求来克服 HCP 和患者层面的障碍。随着我们从传统的面对面护理模式向新的护理模式转变,需要进一步研究以更好地了解数字技术在 HCP-患者关系中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/11168143/1dddf4e83a50/bmjopen-2023-075833f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/11168143/24ac84411f41/bmjopen-2023-075833f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/11168143/1dddf4e83a50/bmjopen-2023-075833f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/11168143/24ac84411f41/bmjopen-2023-075833f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/11168143/1dddf4e83a50/bmjopen-2023-075833f02.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Implementation barriers and facilitators of remote monitoring, remote consultation and digital care platforms through the eyes of healthcare professionals: a review of reviews.

BMJ Open. 2024-6-10

[2]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[3]
Evaluation of Telemedicine Consultations Using Health Outcomes and User Attitudes and Experiences: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-7-9

[4]
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[5]
A scoping review of digital health technologies in multimorbidity management: mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and strategies.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-3-15

[6]
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-11-5

[7]
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[8]
Facilitators and barriers of using digital technology for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A qualitative systematic review.

Int Wound J. 2020-10

[9]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

[10]
Enhancing digital readiness and capability in healthcare: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-4-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Facilitators and barriers to online medical consultation in Iran: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of healthcare policymakers and administrators using the CFIR framework.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-8-13

[2]
Implementing a digital treatment program for patients with irritable bowel syndrome into routine care: a qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators perceived by key stakeholders.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-8-9

[3]
Viewpoints of Healthcare Professionals on Care Delivery Within the Frames of Old-Age Mental Telehealth Services Operating in Low-Resource Settings.

Brain Sci. 2025-6-28

[4]
Barriers to the Utilization of mHealth Applications in Saudi Arabia: Insights from Patients with Chronic Diseases.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-3-18

[5]
Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-3-13

[6]
Co-Design of the Structured Personalised Assessment for Reviews After Cancer (SPARC) Intervention.

Health Expect. 2025-2

[7]
Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Tensions into a Novel Conceptual Model for Telehealth Advancement in Healthcare Organizations.

J Healthc Leadersh. 2024-11-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.

BMC Biol. 2023-9-7

[2]
Digital health for all: How digital health could reduce inequality and increase universal health coverage.

Digit Health. 2023-7-7

[3]
State of telemedicine use in pediatric surgery in the USA-where we stand and what we can gain from the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

World J Pediatr Surg. 2021-3-16

[4]
The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature.

Front Public Health. 2022

[5]
Service process factors affecting patients' and clinicians' experiences on rapid teleconsultation implementation in out-patient neurology services during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022-4-22

[6]
Ageing and health care expenditures: the importance of age per se, steepening of the individual-level expenditure curve, and the role of morbidity.

Eur J Health Econ. 2022-9

[7]
Exploring Barriers to and Enablers of the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology for the Care of Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review.

JMIR Aging. 2022-1-7

[8]
Telehealth in surgery: an umbrella review.

ANZ J Surg. 2021-11

[9]
Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-12-9

[10]
Burnout prevalence among European physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索